[Bug 3629] Building with Clang-17 fails due to -fzero-call-used-regs

2023-11-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3629 --- Comment #12 from Bill Wendling --- (In reply to David Bohman from comment #11) > Thank you for the detailed note, I am reading the article now. It is > about what I expected. Unfortunately, the llvm / clang folks were > not able to reproduce

[Bug 3629] Building with Clang-17 fails due to -fzero-call-used-regs

2023-11-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3629 --- Comment #11 from David Bohman --- Thank you for the detailed note, I am reading the article now. It is about what I expected. Unfortunately, the llvm / clang folks were not able to reproduce the problem with this flag on Linux. -- You are

[Bug 3629] Building with Clang-17 fails due to -fzero-call-used-regs

2023-11-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3629 --- Comment #10 from Darren Tucker --- (In reply to David Bohman from comment #9) > I cherry-picked 2a19e02 ff220d4 99a2df5 on top of V_9_5_P1, and it > does build successfully on my system. Thanks, good to hear! > Are there security

[Bug 3629] Building with Clang-17 fails due to -fzero-call-used-regs

2023-11-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3629 --- Comment #9 from David Bohman --- I cherry-picked 2a19e02 ff220d4 99a2df5 on top of V_9_5_P1, and it does build successfully on my system. Are there security implications associated with not using this flag? -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 3629] Building with Clang-17 fails due to -fzero-call-used-regs

2023-11-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3629 --- Comment #8 from Darren Tucker --- Sigh. Looks like clang is not the only compiler to have problems with this flag: gcc 11 on mips and mipsel (at least on OpenWRT, not sure if it's specific to that or not) also does: cc -g -O2 -pipe

[Bug 3629] Building with Clang-17 fails due to -fzero-call-used-regs

2023-11-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3629 Darren Tucker changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug 3629] Building with Clang-17 fails due to -fzero-call-used-regs

2023-10-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3629 --- Comment #6 from David Bohman --- (In reply to Darren Tucker from comment #5) > (In reply to David Bohman from comment #3) > > Yes, I tried using the fix for Clang-15, but the problem persisted. > > I modified the configure.ac to not use

[Bug 3629] Building with Clang-17 fails due to -fzero-call-used-regs

2023-10-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3629 Darren Tucker changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dtuc...@dtucker.net --- Comment #5 from

[Bug 3629] Building with Clang-17 fails due to -fzero-call-used-regs

2023-10-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3629 --- Comment #4 from David Bohman --- Filed bug against clang https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/69794. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. You are watching the assignee of the

[Bug 3629] Building with Clang-17 fails due to -fzero-call-used-regs

2023-10-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3629 --- Comment #3 from David Bohman --- (In reply to Damien Miller from comment #1) > That looks like a compiler ICE. Please file a bug with the > clang/llvm project - I'm sure they would like to know that their > compiler is crashing. > > Could

[Bug 3629] Building with Clang-17 fails due to -fzero-call-used-regs

2023-10-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3629 Damien Miller changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mo...@google.com --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 3629] Building with Clang-17 fails due to -fzero-call-used-regs

2023-10-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3629 Damien Miller changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@mindrot.org --- Comment #1 from