Rich Salz wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 1999, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
I was thinking more along the lines of the PKCS#11 (but cut down a bit)
to handle this kind of thing where you treat each 'object' as a set of
'attributes' and can search for objects that match a given attribute.
Something
As I was writing this response to Ben I came to realize that this is
a religious issue. I believe libraries should be as simple and general
purpose as possible, and the new STACK_OF() stuff is moving in the
other direction. If no one else thinks like I do I'll shut up and like
it. But here's
Anonymous wrote:
As I was writing this response to Ben I came to realize that this is
a religious issue. I believe libraries should be as simple and general
purpose as possible, and the new STACK_OF() stuff is moving in the
other direction. If no one else thinks like I do I'll shut up and
Let's not go down the C++ path, ever!
-Original Message-
From: Paul Keogh [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 1999 7:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Type-safe stacks
Have you considered using the stack template class from the STL ?
I appreciate
