> > Using OpenSSL-0.9.4 on Solaris 2.6 with latests recommended patches
> >
> > And gcc 2.95.2
> > binutils
> >
> > but when I run make I get the following error
> >
> > making all in crypto...
> > ( echo "#ifndef MK1MF_BUILD"; \
> > echo " /* auto-generated by crypto/Makefile.ssl for crypto/cver
> Using OpenSSL-0.9.4 on Solaris 2.6 with latests recommended patches
>
> And gcc 2.95.2
> binutils
> ...
> gcc -I. -I../include -DTHREADS -D_REENTRANT -DNO_ASM -DRSAref -O3
> -fomit-frame-pointer -m486 -Wall -DL_ENDIAN -c cryptlib.c
> /usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.6/bin/as: option `-s' is ambigu
Everyman wrote:
>
> Using OpenSSL-0.9.4 on Solaris 2.6 with latests recommended patches
>
> And gcc 2.95.2
> binutils
> GNU Bison
> GNU Flex
> tar 1.13
> GNU make
> perl 5.00404
> GNU automake
> GNU autoconf
> GNU libtool
>
> I can compile OpenSSL using sh config rsaref
>
> but when I run make
On Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 08:27:13PM +0100, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
> tomorrow morning. I typically call Configure directly, because the "perl"
> in the default path is perl4 and a "perl5 Configure hpux10-cc" makes
Doesn't config find perl5?
___
>The program should overwrites it's sensible environment variables as soon
as it
>has read the content, therefore strongly reducing the problem.
Assuming the ones that "ps" shows are in userspace not kernel space.
Not always a safe assumption.
_
Peter Gutmann wrote:
> Dr Stephen Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >Is there any circumstances where the environment isn't safe? I believe extra
> >privs are normally needed to read another users processes environment.
>
> Under DEC Unixen you can read anyone's environment without any extr
> running redhat linux 6.1
>
> tried: openssl-0.9.4
>
> ---
> [root@x openssl-0.9.4]# ./config -t
> Operating system: i686-whatever-linux2
> Configuring for linux-elf
> /usr/bin/perl ./Configure linux-elf
> [root@x openssl-0.9.4]#
>
>
> speed.o: In function `speed_main':
> speed.o(.text+0x
> 1) Environment:
> HP-UX svwww012 B.10.20 A 9000/735 2008535444 two-user license
> gcc version 2.7.2.3
>
> 2) Downloaded Package: openssl-0_9_3a_tar This version chosen for max
> compatibilty with Net_SSLeay.pm-1.05 (which is my ultimate desire to get
> operational)
>
> 3) Output of openssl v
Is it just me or does test_mont ever complete? I mean bits assignment
doesn't make any sense to me:
BN_rand(&a,100,0,0); /**/
BN_rand(&b,100,0,0); /**/
for (i=0; ihttp://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager
On Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 06:27:05PM +0100, Andy Polyakov wrote:
> > As for my personal preferences: I would prefer to define this -DMD32_XARRAY
> > in "Configure" so that the mechanism is visible and documented.
> Makes sense... Grab snapshot later today and check it out. BTW, what are
> you used t
Michael Sierchio wrote:
> "Rene G. Eberhard (keyon)" wrote:
>
> > ...Unicode for example is suppored by
> > Universal and UTF8.
>
> I also meant to point out that UTF-8 supports ASCII, but not EBCDIC, for
> example (not that I imagine that anyone would want to use the latter...;-)
Well, we're ge
"Salz, Rich" wrote:
>
> >can CRLs be signed by a certificate that is not the CA certificate
>
> No.
Ok, but may be there is a solution (that i never tried and it might be
uncompatible with lot of existing software.) :
If i understand well, you do not want to have your CA keys online for
securi
12 matches
Mail list logo
