[openssl.org #269] [PATCH] Support for Subject Directory Attributes redux

This patch is a replacement for RT/openssl.org: Ticket #237. Please retract Ticket #237. The following patch provides basic support for Subject Directory Attributes, which are defined in the x509 spec (RFC 2459), but are currently unsupported by OpenSSL. openssl.cnf entries for Subject

[openssl.org #270] API: certificate chain handling incomplete

I noticed that that the functions SSL_CTX_use_certificate_file and SSL_CTX_use_certificate_chain_file are available for use with an SSL_CTX *, yet there is no chain version available to set with an SSL *, only SSL_use_certificate_file and friends. Any particular reason for this? Tom -- Tom

Re: [openssl.org #270] API: certificate chain handling incomplete

On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 09:36:09AM +0200, Tom Wu via RT wrote: I noticed that that the functions SSL_CTX_use_certificate_file and SSL_CTX_use_certificate_chain_file are available for use with an SSL_CTX *, yet there is no chain version available to set with an SSL *, only

[openssl.org #268] Very minor documentation patch

[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Sep 4 21:15:50 2002]: ... The comments above say URI, but the example shows URL. Thanks, fixed. Best regards, __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development

[openssl.org #263] Apparently Missing OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms in 0.9.7-beta3

[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Sep 1 19:01:48 2002]: In compiling MySql-4.0.2-alpha, I get the following error messages related to OpenSSL shown below. Using STRINGS to check the differences between OpenSSL-0.9.6a and OpenSSL-0.9.7-beta3 shows OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms in 0.9.6a but not

Re: Ressource leak in chil ? [hw_ncipher.c]

Since I wrote that I have also observed the LoadBLOB No Memory on one server consitently - but not on some other much busier servers. I am using the same apache binary on all these servers, and they're all solaris 8, but I have not compared the hwcrhk libs or hardserver version. So I will do

Re: Ressource leak in chil ? [hw_ncipher.c]

Peter Viertel wrote: -rwxrwxr-x 1 root bin 921856 Apr 5 2001 libnfhwcrhk.so The only difference I can see is the hardserver binary is different on each box - the package version of NCnfast on each is 1.72.3 but on the We have 1.78.11, libnfhwchrk.so size is 1158332 and

[openssl.org #265] Bug Report - Ordinal 2915 cannot be found in Libeay32.dll

This problem has been resolved. int EVP_EncryptInit_ex(EVP_CIPHER_CTX *ctx, const EVP_CIPHER *type, ENGINE *impl, unsigned char *key, unsigned char *iv); EVP_EncryptInit_ex(ctx, EVP_bf_cbc(), NULL, key, iv); In the example at

Re: Ressource leak in chil ? [hw_ncipher.c]

Juergen Brauckmann wrote: We now applied the nCipher patches from their NCsslypd package (which also use libnfhwcrhk.so) to non-engine openssl 0.9.6g. The patches are for openssl 0.9.6b, but whith some trivial changes they work for openssl 0.9.6g too. This works much better, no NoMemory

Is the openssl.org site down?

I haven't been able to access it for two days now. I can traceroute to it, but every html client times out. I have tried different browsers and even text based http clients, e.g. links. Thanks -Baber __ OpenSSL Project

Re: Is the openssl.org site down?

Baber Amin wrote: I haven't been able to access it for two days now. I can traceroute to it, but every html client times out. I have tried different browsers and even text based http clients, e.g. links. Looks like the web server process is down. I haven't been able to get to