In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 6 Apr 2003 12:36:11 +0200, Nils Larsch <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> said:
nlarsch> Richard Levitte wrote:
nlarsch> ...
nlarsch> > +int EVP_PKEY_cmp(EVP_PKEY *a, EVP_PKEY *b)
nlarsch>
nlarsch> Wouldn't be EVP_PKEY_cmp(const EVP_PKEY *a, const EVP_PKEY *b)
nlarsch>
Hi Richard,
Richard Levitte wrote:
...
> +int EVP_PKEY_cmp(EVP_PKEY *a, EVP_PKEY *b)
Wouldn't be EVP_PKEY_cmp(const EVP_PKEY *a, const EVP_PKEY *b)
more appropriate ?
> + {
> + if (a->type != b->type)
> + return -1;
> +
> + switch (a->type)
> + {
> +#i
