[openssl.org #884]

2004-05-12 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
Thanks guys, I'm hereby resolving this ticket. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed May 12 01:49:56 2004]: Great. Thanks! /Sam On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 17:24, Matthew Natalier wrote: This looks like a bug which has already been discussed in the mailing list, and fixed. The diff is here:

Re: Win32 compiles under cygwin

2004-05-12 Thread Andy Polyakov
So based on Howard's comments, I tried using the mingw approach. Everything compiled, but the link in apps of openssl failed with an undefined reference to '___getreent' (called from dhparam.c 3 times) Any clues to fixing this? mingw is a supported target. If you can confirm that problem

Re: Win32 compiles under cygwin

2004-05-12 Thread Andy Polyakov
Howard, Would you be interested in supporting MSVC command-line builds using gcc2cl? Well, if you choose to discuss unrelated matters, at least fulfill previous direct promises first:-):-):-) I'm half kidding and half referring to the question about what do you replace ar with and/or how do

RE: Win32 compiles under cygwin

2004-05-12 Thread Howard Chu
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy Polyakov Howard, Would you be interested in supporting MSVC command-line builds using gcc2cl? I toyed with this idea once before; I'm not opposed to it. Feel free to submit your scripts/patches

RE: Win32 compiles under cygwin

2004-05-12 Thread Steven Reddie
Right, I was flat out today and forgot about that, probably because I don't understand what is significant about how ar/lib is invoked. We're relying on the OpenSSL build to use Cygwin's ar and it turns out that the resulting libcrypto.a is compatible with Microsoft's tools (eg. link ...

Re: Win32 compiles under cygwin

2004-05-12 Thread Andy Polyakov
Right, I was flat out today and forgot about that, probably because I don't understand what is significant about how ar/lib is invoked. We're relying on the OpenSSL build to use Cygwin's ar and it turns out that the resulting libcrypto.a is compatible with Microsoft's tools (eg. link ...

Re: Inclusion of FIPS

2004-05-12 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 12 May 2004 06:25:43 -0600, The Doctor [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: doctor Why does no FIPS still include FIPS?? It doesn't, all it does is throw the FIPS files through the compiler. However, the FIPS source should be wrapped with #ifdef OPENSSL_FIPS .. #endif.

RE: Inclusion of FIPS

2004-05-12 Thread Marquess, Steve Mr JMLFDC
Title: RE: Inclusion of FIPS Richard Levitte wrote: doctor Why does no FIPS still include FIPS?? It doesn't, all it does is throw the FIPS files through the compiler. However, the FIPS source should be wrapped with #ifdef OPENSSL_FIPS .. #endif. fips_rand.c wasn't, for some reason, and I

Re: [openssl.org #700] Ticket Resolved

2004-05-12 Thread Robin Ehrlich via RT
Thank you very much for corrrecting this problem. Robin - Original Message - From: Stephen Henson via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 12:31 PM Subject: [openssl.org #700] Ticket Resolved According to our records, your request has been

Re: Inclusion of FIPS

2004-05-12 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 12 May 2004 08:48:52 -0400, Marquess, Steve Mr JMLFDC [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Steve.Marquess We are very close (a few days at most) from the point Steve.Marquess where the 26 special source files in the ./fips/ tree Steve.Marquess can no longer be modified

RE: Win32 compiles under cygwin

2004-05-12 Thread Steven Reddie
Yes, I was surprised too. I don't know if it's because Cygwin's ar has been made compatible with Microsoft's lib format, or if the two formats have always been the compatible. One advantage of using gcc2cl is that you don't need to worry about most of the Microsoft specifics such as .obj vs .o.

OpenSSL error: sslv3 alert bad record mac (fwd)

2004-05-12 Thread Jason A. Pfeil
Greetings List! My apologies for cross-posting this request, however since I have receved exactly zero replies to this or my previous message, I fear that my choice of list to send this to was wrong. To try and correct that if necessary, and to hopefully receive some information, I have posted

Re: Inclusion of FIPS

2004-05-12 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Marquess, Steve Mr JMLFDC wrote We are very close (a few days at most) from the point where the 26 special source files in the ./fips/ tree can no longer be modified (or else the FIPS validation won't apply). These files are identified by the SHA-1 HMAC signatures in the fingerprint.sha1 files;