Re: Finally time for IPvn support

2004-10-04 Thread Howard Chu
Lev Walkin wrote: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: Hi, I've just been hacking around a little bit to add IPv6 capability, and I thought of syntax for host and port specifications. As it is now, the syntax used a little everywhere in OpenSSL is {host}:{port}. Unfortunately, if we're to support

Re: Finally time for IPvn support

2004-10-04 Thread Lev Walkin
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: Hi, I've just been hacking around a little bit to add IPv6 capability, and I thought of syntax for host and port specifications. As it is now, the syntax used a little everywhere in OpenSSL is {host}:{port}. Unfortunately, if we're to support IPv6 numeric addre

Finally time for IPvn support

2004-10-04 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
Hi, I've just been hacking around a little bit to add IPv6 capability, and I thought of syntax for host and port specifications. As it is now, the syntax used a little everywhere in OpenSSL is {host}:{port}. Unfortunately, if we're to support IPv6 numeric addresses, I find myself in a little bit

[openssl.org #662] default_md for CRLs

2004-10-04 Thread via RT
Hi, looks like the bug is still alive and I know the first real user where this bug creates a policy violation. Therefore I created a patch to allow the easiest way of bugfixing :) Best regards Michael __ OpenSSL Project