hunting for small OpenSSL libs

2005-10-24 Thread Claas Hilbrecht
I'm trying to merge the work from Martin Witzel (openssl-e dated from Nov. 2003) to reduce the OpensSSL footprint (for 386'er x86). With OpenSSL 0.9.7 is was able to reduce the library size down to 1070834 bytes libcrypto.a 159774 bytes libssl.a if only DES, MD5, RSA and SHA are used. Now

Re: s23_srvr.c

2005-10-24 Thread Peter Sylvester
Bodo Moeller wrote: On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 11:17:47AM +0200, Peter Sylvester wrote: In s23_srvr.c there is a length test if ((csl+sil+cl+11) != s-packet_length) { SSLerr(SSL_F_GET_CLIENT_HELLO,SSL_R_RECORD_LENGTH_MISMATCH) in case that the record contains a SSLV3 or

Dynamic Engine problems with some 0.9.7x version

2005-10-24 Thread Marco GRELLA
Hi all, I have developed an OpenSSL Engine for our hw crypto accelerator. I have no problems in using it as a dynamic engine with OpenSSL 0.9.8, neither I have problems in loading it with OpenSSL 0.9.7d. But I get problems with 0.9.7g/i (so, I guess 'h' too) versions. Here I report the

Re: s23_srvr.c

2005-10-24 Thread Bodo Moeller
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 04:08:19PM +0200, Peter Sylvester wrote: [...] I.e., a client that connects to a server can *either* support SSL 2.0 servers *or* use TLS extensions, but not both. The SSL 3.0 and TLS 1.0 specifications have the forward compatibility

Re: s23_srvr.c

2005-10-24 Thread Peter Sylvester
Bodo Moeller wrote: On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 04:08:19PM +0200, Peter Sylvester wrote: [...] I.e., a client that connects to a server can *either* support SSL 2.0 servers *or* use TLS extensions, but not both. The SSL 3.0 and TLS 1.0 specifications have the

[no subject]

2005-10-24 Thread upinder singh
Dear Developers, I am interested in plugging in my own implementations of the crypto algorithm AES(rijndael) into the open ssl source code.Later on I would also like to do the same for the RSA algo and the symmetric key generator(AES based PRBG as per FIPS stds). Please guide me how to go about