In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:00:17 +0100, "Dr. Stephen
Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
steve> The other is that its equivalent to EVP_CipherUpdate() and
steve> EVP_CipherFinal() which can output data in arbitrary sizes
steve> whereas our stuff will never be more than one
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:37:19 +0100, "Dr.
> Stephen Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> steve> As for incompatible chanhes there is one nasty incompatibility
> steve> with PKCS#11 which EVP might have to
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:37:19 +0100, "Dr. Stephen
Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
steve> As for incompatible chanhes there is one nasty incompatibility
steve> with PKCS#11 which EVP might have to address if we ever need a
steve> full PKCS#11 ENGINE. Even that though
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005, Pradosh Adoni wrote:
> > pradosh.adoni> for eg. Of the current list of interfaces which ones
> > pradosh.adoni> are most definitely going to be deprecated in future
> > pradosh.adoni> versions ?
> >
> > For the longest time, we have recommended to use the EVP interface
> > ra
Hi All,
While seeing the "Major changes between Openssl 0.9.7g and Openssl
0.9.8" I found that for Win64 support it says
: "Added initial support for Win64"
But I am not able to find out what initial support does this provide?
Could anyone elaborate on this?
Thanks & regards
Ashith
Related info from testlog file ( is used instead of the full path):
--
Options: --openssldir=/openssl enable-threads -D_REENTRANT
enable-shared no-gmp no-krb5 no-mdc2 no-rc5 no-zlib no-zlib-dynamic
OS (uname): AIX
Bug Report
Release: 0.9.7i
OS: Solaris 7,8
Architecture: Sparc v8
The Configure entry for solaris-sparcv8-cc is missing the dynamic loader
options. The options "-G -dy -z text" should be inserted just after
":-KPIC:" as with the other solaris entries for SunCC. Thanks,
__
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:45:15 +0530, Pradosh Adoni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
pradosh.adoni> so ,would it make more sense to standardize on the EVP
pradosh.adoni> interface as opposed to the lower level functions ?
pradosh.adoni> This would force developers seeking LSB
