Re: [openssl.org #1436] rsautl sign is not sign

2006-12-06 Thread Kyle Hamilton
On 12/5/06, Magosányi Árpád [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2006/12/5, Stephen Henson via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If you need to use those then the dgst signing and verify operations should use them but you pass the data which should be digested and not the digest value itself. As the token is

Re: [openssl.org #1436] rsautl sign is not sign

2006-12-06 Thread Kyle Hamilton via RT
On 12/5/06, Magosányi Árpád [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2006/12/5, Stephen Henson via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If you need to use those then the dgst signing and verify operations should use them but you pass the data which should be digested and not the digest value itself. As the token

[openssl.org #1343] bug in documentation

2006-12-06 Thread Nils Larsch via RT
doc/crypto/RSA_get_ex_new_index.pod: The typedefs in were indeed wrong as they should specify the CRYPTO_EX_foobar() functions. I copied the relevant typedefs from crypto/ossl_typ.h. doc/crypto/BIO_ctrl.pod: the current text looks correct. doc/crypto/BIO_set_callback.pod: As the callback here

[openssl.org #1435] Patch: EC key processing

2006-12-06 Thread Haridharan via RT
Nils, Tested and patch works!!! Thanks, Haridharan. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager

OPENSSL_RFC3779

2006-12-06 Thread Gisle Vanem
As it is now one must add OPENSSL_RFC3779 to the CFLAGS to make todays snapshot to build. Otherwise I'm getting link errors like: Cannot export ASIdOrRange_free: symbol not defined Shouldn't defines like: #ifdef OPENSSL_RFC3779 be replaced with: #ifndef OPENSSL_NO_RFC3779 Or is it required

[openssl.org #1436] rsautl sign is not sign

2006-12-06 Thread Stephen Henson via RT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Dec 6 06:32:05 2006]: 2006/12/5, Stephen Henson via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The sign and verify options of RSA are a kind of raw sign operation. The PKCS#11 API does support it but some tokens do not. It is not clear if the problem in your case is the PKCS#11

[openssl.org #1434] Bug report - link error when openssl-0.9.7l compiled with no-ssl2 flag

2006-12-06 Thread Nils Larsch via RT
I've committed a fix for 0.9.7-stable. Could you test a new snapshot ? Concerning 0.9.8: I was unable to reproduce your problem ... which openssl 0.9.8 version did you test ? Cheers, Nils __ OpenSSL Project