[openssl.org #1635] openssl configure tries to force 64-bit mode in 32-bit chroot. (x86) fails to compile

2008-01-26 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis via RT
I'm running a 32-bit chroot on an x86_64 machine. That is, the kernel can execute 64 and 32 bit binaries, but everything has been compiled with -m32 within the chroot. All the installed packages including gcc and glibc have just been recompiled with -m32 with the compilation done within the

[openssl.org #1635] openssl configure tries to force 64-bit mode in 32-bit chroot. (x86) fails to compile

2008-01-26 Thread Stephen Henson via RT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Jan 26 22:21:55 2008]: I'm running a 32-bit chroot on an x86_64 machine. That is, the kernel can execute 64 and 32 bit binaries, but everything has been compiled with -m32 within the chroot. All the installed packages including gcc and glibc have just been

Re: Static global - bug? (Re: Two valgrind warnings in OpenSSL-possible bug???)

2008-01-26 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Paul Sheer wrote: Locking with no contention is not pretty expensive, it's darn near free. Oh? If this is true it changes things somewhat. But I must say that I believe that no-one has ever used OpenSSL with 10'000 concurrent SSL objects. So I'm not going to take the chance that