On Monday 13 October 2008 18:05:17 David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 13:08 -0700, Pirasenna Velandai Thiyagarajan
>
> wrote:
> > How to load a DSO from within an engine?
>
> See the code that this patch is mostly ripping out in favour of direct
> linking:
> http://git.infradead.org/use
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 13:08 -0700, Pirasenna Velandai Thiyagarajan
wrote:
> How to load a DSO from within an engine?
See the code that this patch is mostly ripping out in favour of direct
linking:
http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/openssl-tpm-engine.git?a=commitdiff;h=624a38a1
--
David Woodho
Which version of openssl are you using?
Cheers,
Geoff
On Monday 13 October 2008 16:08:53 Pirasenna Velandai Thiyagarajan wrote:
> How to load a DSO from within an engine?
>
> I call DSO_load(NULL, "mylibname", NULL, 0);
>
> The code path I debugged is as follows:
> #0 DSO_ctrl (dso=0x48ab98, cmd
How to load a DSO from within an engine?
I call DSO_load(NULL, "mylibname", NULL, 0);
The code path I debugged is as follows:
#0 DSO_ctrl (dso=0x48ab98, cmd=2, larg=0, parg=0x0) at dso_lib.c:338
#1 0x2abb9c90 in DSO_load (dso=0x0, filename=0x2ae00888 "mylibname",
meth=0x0, flags=0) at dso_lib.c
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 09:01 +0200, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
> Note: I have reverted the DTLS1_BAD_VER part as DTLS1_BAD_VER handling
> is not present in HEAD (0.9.9).
That makes sense.
I assume that DTLS1_BAD_VER handling wasn't added to HEAD because the
pre-RFC version of DTLS was considered
> [jaenicke - Fri Oct 10 12:42:51 2008]:
>
> I have applied the patch to 0.9.8-stable and adopted it to 0.9.9-dev. I
> am not very familiar with the DTLS implementation so hopefully I did not
> break it.
Note: I have reverted the DTLS1_BAD_VER part as DTLS1_BAD_VER handling
is not
present in HEAD
>From answer only sent to mailing list:
Yeah, it looks right. I haven't yet got it working with my test case,
because I need to use DTLS1_BAD_VER and there are other parts missing
from HEAD for that, on top of my patch in #1751 -- but I agree with your
assessment that it shouldn't be needed any lo
