RE: [openssl.org #1790] [Patch] Windows CE 5 and following support

2009-01-16 Thread maurice.kalinow...@nokia.com
Hi, Please find attached an updated version for Windows CE 5 and following compile support of the openssl trunk. Some changes needed to be done to the build system, the source changes themselves are a little bit cleaner. Also followed some of Roumen Petrov recommendations, like - not always

AES x86_64 assembler patch to quieten memory debuggers

2009-01-16 Thread Number Cruncher
According to the CVS history for the i586 AES assembler code - http://cvs.openssl.org/rlog?f=openssl/crypto/aes/asm/aes-586.pl , Andy Polyakov patched the AES_cbc_encrypt assembly to prevent memory debuggers such as valgrind warning about invalid writes. I've just come across the same issue on

Re: poor sha1 performance on Solaris 8

2009-01-16 Thread schoppert
Yes, I understand the goal of OPENSSL_cleanse() ... and I understand the potential implications of changing it to bring up performance on 0.9.6m. My concern is that modifying OPENSSL_cleanse() does not help performance on 0.9.7m or 0.9.8j ... which means, the performance hit is coming from

About the MSVC project files for openssl

2009-01-16 Thread oos.z...@gmail.com
hi I'm working on the platform on win2k with msvc++. I need the MSVC project files for openssl, so I found a link http://www.iconsinc.com/~agray/ossldev/, but it looks not work, I can't open it .Can someboy give me a good link or send a package about the project files?Thanks .

Re: About the MSVC project files for openssl

2009-01-16 Thread Ger Hobbelt
See my http://www.hebbut.net/ (OpenSSL source code has some patches as well; diff against 0.9.9 as listed in the VERSION.txt file in there and you'll be able to see what has been changed. Also included is a 'mega_monolith' application a la 'openssl' monolith, but now also with a lot of the other