> [brendan.kenn...@intel.com - Tue Mar 02 00:49:24 2010]:
>
> Sending the patch without the copyright – we don’t require it to be
>there for small code changes.
>
Fix now applied, thanks for the report.
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer.
Commercial tech support
Sending the patch without the copyright – we don’t require it to be there for
small code changes.
Regards,
Brendan
--
Intel Shannon Limited
Registered in Ireland
Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare
An OpenSSL 0.9.8m kit which appears to work on VMS should be
available at:
http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/0_9_8m/openssl-0_9_8m_s1.zip
I believe that that kit is entirely UNIX-compatible (case-preserved,
symlinks, and so on).
Notes and "gdiff -ru" output:
http://antinode.inf
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010, Kern Sibbald via RT wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Monday 01 March 2010 17:30:37 Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
> > An alternative if you really want to keep changes to a minimum is to use
> > the renamed functions EVP_PKEY_encrypt_old and EVP_PKEY_decrypt_old but
> > you'd need versi
Hello,
On Monday 01 March 2010 17:30:37 Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
> An alternative if you really want to keep changes to a minimum is to use
> the renamed functions EVP_PKEY_encrypt_old and EVP_PKEY_decrypt_old but
> you'd need version dependence in that case.
>
Thank you for the very fast res
An alternative if you really want to keep changes to a minimum is to use
the renamed functions EVP_PKEY_encrypt_old and EVP_PKEY_decrypt_old but
you'd need version dependence in that case.
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer.
Commercial tech support now available see:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010, Jan C. wrote:
> Hello,
> I have an engine which implements the rsa_generate_key method. When I
> want to generate a private key with the genrsa command, the key is
> generated in software mode:
>
> > openssl genrsa -engine myengine -out /tmp/priv.pem 1024
>
> I see that
I suppose it's just not my day today, third time lucky...
OK here's the portable example:
/* EVP_PKEY structure pkey */
RSA *trsa = EVP_PKEY_get1_RSA(pkey);
ret = RSA_public_encrypt(key_len, key, encrypted_key, trsa,
RSA_PKCS1_PADDING);
RSA_free
> [steve - Mon Mar 01 14:57:21 2010]:
>
Darn message got cut short... continued.
>
> You can do this:
>
> ret = RSA_public_encrypt(key_len, key, encrypted_key, key->pkey.rsa,
> RSA_PKCS1_PADDING);
>
Which is a drop in replacement for what you already in there. It
accesses the internals of "k
> [k...@sibbald.com - Mon Mar 01 13:38:48 2010]:
>
> Hello,
>
> This is something between a request for information and a bug report.
>
> Background:
> We have been using OpenSSL for many years in Bacula, which has created
> a
> number of license problems because we are GPL.
>
> Problem:
> Our
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
>
> Can you give me a pointer to where to see this code and I can give some more
> information about how to address this.
>
Ah scrub that I've just spotted the code.
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer.
Commercial tech
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010, Kern Sibbald via RT wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is something between a request for information and a bug report.
>
> Background:
> We have been using OpenSSL for many years in Bacula, which has created a
> number of license problems because we are GPL.
>
> Problem:
> Our u
Hello,
This is something between a request for information and a bug report.
Background:
We have been using OpenSSL for many years in Bacula, which has created a
number of license problems because we are GPL.
Problem:
Our users are reporting that Bacula no longer compiles under Fedora 12 beca
> [brendan.kenn...@intel.com - Mon Mar 01 09:24:24 2010]:
>
> Hi All,
>
Note that due to this copyright notice:
# Copyright(c) 2007,2008,2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
# All rights reserved.
#
# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
# modific
I'm not sure the old code was wrong either.
It's unintuitive, but it is at least possible to pass the NIST compliance
tests with the old code - are you sure that's going to be possible with the
new code ?
Yes, I'm aware that there have been a lot of complaints about CFB in the
past - but it was at
Hello,
I have an engine which implements the rsa_generate_key method. When I
want to generate a private key with the genrsa command, the key is
generated in software mode:
> openssl genrsa -engine myengine -out /tmp/priv.pem 1024
I see that in the rsa_gen.c file the rsa structure, does not p
Hi All,
Attached is a patch to the OpenSSL cryptodev engine
(crypto/engine/eng_cryptodev.c). It was initially tested against OpenSSL0.9.8g,
however before sending this email I validated the changes with the latest 1.0.0
and 0.9.8 stable snapshots.
I include a description of each change bel
Hi,
With version 0.9.8m we're unable to read encrypted data written by
older versions. The commit that breaks it has this changelog:
The "block length" for CFB mode was incorrectly coded as 1 all the time. It
should be the number of feedback bits expressed in bytes. For CFB1 mode set
18 matches
Mail list logo
