I agree entirely, but why not fix the other registers while we're at it?
I've attached a version of your diff with the extra registers' unwind info
added--- untested, unfortunately--- it'll also need a
sub ::cfi_restore { ::emit(.cfi_restore,@_); }
in x86gas.pl and the corresponding stub
On 27/06/11 11:54, Peter Sylvester via RT wrote:
On 06/26/2011 08:05 PM, Peter Sylvester wrote:
On 06/26/2011 02:59 PM, Alain Knaff via RT wrote:
Hello,
openssl s_client -connect hostname.domain.com:443 does not verify that
the certificate matches the hostname. (i.e. hostname.domain.com
Thanks Steve. This helps a lot. One more related question: Why are the
FIPS test vectors different for different platforms? It seems like
Windows and Linux, for example, should both be able to encrypt the
same things and produce the same outputs.
Thanks again,
Tyrel
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:44
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011, Tyrel Haveman wrote:
Thanks Steve. This helps a lot. One more related question: Why are the
FIPS test vectors different for different platforms? It seems like
Windows and Linux, for example, should both be able to encrypt the
same things and produce the same outputs.
On 06/29/2011 04:46 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011, Tyrel Haveman wrote:
Thanks Steve. This helps a lot. One more related question: Why are the
FIPS test vectors different for different platforms? It seems like
Windows and Linux, for example, should both be able to encrypt
On 28 Jun 2011, at 5:56 PM, Wim Lewis wrote:
Several of the other assembly files could use the same treatment as well:
md5-x86_64.pl uses %rbp to point to one of its arguments, sha1-586.pl uses
%ebp as a scratch register, etc.
It occurs to me that a lot of the CFI management could be done
