On 1/9/2012 7:38 AM, Steve Marquess wrote:
>
> It is not relevant ... an attempt to deal with a Microsoft Windows
> issue. We have since identified a better work-around that does not
> involve changes to the module code.
>
> Since we're probably going to be asked, here's the issue: we found tha
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012, Dew Kumar wrote:
>
> It looks like the TLS 1.2 protocol is being implemented currently. Is there
> an anticipated completion date for when v1.2 will be fully implemented?
>
The protocol is fully implemented though new features (ciphersuites for
example) will be added over
On 01/08/2012 11:11 PM, Paul Suhler wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> What is the file openssl-fips-2.0rc2.tar.gz.1, which is about an hour newer
> than the one listed below?
It is not relevant ... an attempt to deal with a Microsoft Windows
issue. We have since identified a better work-around that does not
Hi Dev Team,
It looks like the TLS 1.2 protocol is being implemented currently. Is there an
anticipated completion date for when v1.2 will be fully implemented?
Thanks in advance!
Thanks,
Dew Kumar
Ping?
Joakim Tjernlund/Transmode wrote on 2011/12/27 19:46:27:
>
> http://www.openssl.org/docs/crypto/ERR_remove_state.html
>
> Above URL mentions nothing about it being deprecated and its
> replacement ERR_remove_thread_state() is nowhere to be found.
>
> Jocke
__