I sent a patch to RT a few hours ago. I didn't get an ack of any kind
and don't see it in the tracker -- any way to tell where it went?
The message-ID was <20120304175840.ga12...@panix.com> .
--
Thor Lancelot Simon t...@panix.com
"The liberties...lose
Hi,
RFC 6187 "X.509v3 Certificates for Secure Shell Authentication" defines
two extended key usage
( http://tools.ietf.org /html/rfc6187#section-2.2.2 ) with numbers 21
and 22 for secure shell client and server respectively.
Currently in OpenSSL last number defined is 10.
This request is only
Kevin Vargo via RT wrote:
> Some minor updates to the openssl.spec: wrapping ifarch around the various
> lib dirs to get the right files in the right places.
>
> See attached diff
>
Configure script and spec are not consistent regarding multilib. It
seems to me spec file should use libdir script
Kevin Vargo via RT wrote:
Some minor updates to the openssl.spec: wrapping ifarch around the various lib
dirs to get the right files in the right places.
See attached diff
Configure script and spec are not consistent regarding multilib. It
seems to me spec file should use libdir script para
* Stephen Henson via RT | 2012-03-03 14:41:51 [+0100]:
>> [sebast...@breakpoint.cc - Fri Mar 02 08:55:25 2012]:
>>
>> * Stephen Henson via RT | 2012-02-27 17:43:48 [+0100]:
>>
>> >According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any
>> >further questions or concerns, please