Andy Polyakov appro at openssl.org writes:
I tested this on the x86 version of the DLL and I imagine it will fix
the x64 DLL as well (they both reported the same error). It looks
like this setting will need to be added for VS2010.
As mentioned [in another reply], I was under
HI,
You are right, the optimalisations are the issue.
When I compile it with O0 then it's OK.
I also found that problem occurs in macros Siga0,1 Maj, ...
Wth O0 there are correct valus but with O2 there are incorrect values.
Compiler must have some problem there.
( I also test to modify
On 14/04/2012 12:50 AM, Andy Polyakov wrote:
What happens if you add wait; at the very end of
crypto/asm/sha1-x86_64.pl?
It just hangs.
Regards,
Jonathan
__
OpenSSL Project
Andy Polyakov appro at openssl.org writes:
I tested this on the x86 version of the DLL and I imagine it will fix
the x64 DLL as well (they both reported the same error). It looks
like this setting will need to be added for VS2010.
As mentioned [in another reply], I was under
Hi,
This patch compiles out BIO_socket_nbio() and the body of
BIO_new_ssl_connect() if OPENSSL_NO_SOCK is set.
* BIO_socket_nbio() looks like its author forgot to put it in the #ifndef block.
* BIO_new_ssl_connect() calls BIO_s_connect() which is compiled out by
OPENSSL_NO_SOCK. It makes the
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012, Vimol Kshetrimayum wrote:
Andy Polyakov appro at openssl.org writes:
I tested this on the x86 version of the DLL and I imagine it will fix
the x64 DLL as well (they both reported the same error). It looks
like this setting will need to be added for VS2010.
http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=22334 is interim solution,
proper solution will be provided at later point (if found appropriate).
Thanks, this circumvents the DTLS issue.
The TLS empty fragments issue remains,
http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=22390
Here is an experimental patch I wrote that implements the 1/n-1
record splitting technique for OpenSSL. I am sending it here for
consideration by OpenSSL upstream developers.
By default the 0/n split is used but in case the
SSL_OP_DONT_INSERT_EMPTY_FRAGMENTS flag is set, we split the first
What happens if you add wait; at the very end of
crypto/asm/sha1-x86_64.pl?
It just hangs.
'which perl'? If not /bin/perl, i.e. non-MSYS perl, then I'd suggest to
complement MSYS installation with MSYS perl.
__
OpenSSL
Leandro Santiago via RT wrote:
I also tested with mingw64:gcc and mingw:gcc. The results were the
same in the three machines. And I'm using a no-patched openssl
downloaded from openssl.org.
Where :gcc come from? As Roumen mentioned, it's mingw [or mingw64], not
mingw:gcc, mingw32:gcc, nor
10 matches
Mail list logo