> Is this anyway to set a font type so that it all looks the same ?
This is most definitely NOT an OpenSSL issue. OpenSSL has absolutely no
concept of fonts, markup, or anything like that.
/r$
--
Principal Security Engineer
Akamai Technology
Cambridge, MA
Same fix for 1.0.0 branch:
diff --git a/ssl/s3_cbc.c b/ssl/s3_cbc.c
index 5b3f371..61413b8 100644
--- a/ssl/s3_cbc.c
+++ b/ssl/s3_cbc.c
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ int tls1_cbc_remove_padding(const SSL* s,
unsigned padding_length, good, to_check, i;
const unsigned overhead = 1 /* padding l
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 13:24 -0800, Ben Laurie wrote:
> > Ah, it looks like you only moved the offending code; it was actually
> > Ben's fault in commit 9f27de17 / 014265eb.
>
> Gah! I wish tests would pick up stuff like this!
As far as I'm aware there are no tests for DTLS1_BAD_VER. Apart from my
> From 32cc2479b473c49ce869e57fded7e9a77b695c0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "Dr. Stephen Henson"
> Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 21:06:37 +
> Subject: [PATCH] Fix IV check and padding removal.
...
+ if (s->version >= TLS1_1_VERSION || s->version == DTLS1_VERSION)
That's redundant, isn't i
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 20:59 +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > From 32cc2479b473c49ce869e57fded7e9a77b695c0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: "Dr. Stephen Henson"
> > Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 21:06:37 +
> > Subject: [PATCH] Fix IV check and padding removal.
> ...
> + if (s->version >= TLS1
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 07:22:49PM +0100, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 06:33:39PM +0100, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 05:07:22PM +0100, OpenSSL w
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 06:33:39PM +0100, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 05:07:22PM +0100, OpenSSL wrote:
> > > >
> > > >OpenSSL version 1.0.1e released
> > > >===
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 06:33:39PM +0100, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 05:07:22PM +0100, OpenSSL wrote:
> > >
> > >OpenSSL version 1.0.1e released
> > >===
> > >
> >
> > Running the test su
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 05:07:22PM +0100, OpenSSL wrote:
> >
> >OpenSSL version 1.0.1e released
> >===
> >
>
> Running the test suite gives me:
> [...]
> Testing ciphersuites
> Testing ciphersuites for TLSv1.2
> Test
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 05:07:22PM +0100, OpenSSL wrote:
>
>OpenSSL version 1.0.1e released
>===
>
Running the test suite gives me:
[...]
Testing ciphersuites
Testing ciphersuites for TLSv1.2
Testing AES256-GCM-SHA384
Available compression methods:
1: zlib c
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013, Attila-Mihaly Balazs wrote:
> The linked changelist (http://www.openssl.org/source/exp/CHANGES)
> comes up as a 404 to me.
>
Ugh that's another artificate from CVS which needs updating for git.
FYI the only significant change is the corrected fix for CVE-2013-0169
Steve.
The linked changelist (http://www.openssl.org/source/exp/CHANGES)
comes up as a 404 to me.
Regards,
Attila Balazs
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:07 PM, OpenSSL wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>OpenSSL version 1.0.1e released
>===
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenSSL version 1.0.1e released
===
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of
version 1.0.1e of our open source
On Sat Feb 09 15:02:54 2013, i...@ecsystems.nl wrote:
>
> Same here, but what are we missing by not using /WX ? can the build be
> relied upon since it is a fatal error to begin with... if it was a
> warning I would not be concerned.
>
The /WX flags means "treat all warnings as errors".
Steve.
--
> Andy Polyakov via RT Mon, 11 Feb 2013 01:18:37 -0800
>> .\ssl\s3_cbc.c(251) : error C2220: warning treated as error - no object file
>> generated
>> .\ssl\s3_cbc.c(251) : warning C4029: declared formal parameter list
>> different
>> from definition
>> NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'cl' : return c
Bin Lin,
I know this won't be of much help but I've built with VS2008 and it seems to
build fine. Can you provide more details about the failure? Is it a missing
symbol? Syntax error?
Also, I'd be interested to know if you are able to run the openssl tests
successfully once it's built with
On 02/07/2013 03:35 PM, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to follow the steps for cloning the git repository found on
> http://www.openssl.org/source/repos.html from behind a proxy. The proxy
> does not allow connections to the git port 9418.
>
> I tried http/https which both fai
>>> .\ssl\s3_cbc.c(645) : warning C4761: integral size mismatch in argument;
>>> conversion supplied
>>> NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'cl' : return code '0x2'
>>> Stop.
>> fixed in
>> http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=ff58eaa4b645a38f3a226cf566d969fffa64ef94
>
> Downloade
18 matches
Mail list logo