[openssl.org #1364] index.txt corruptions

2013-04-11 Thread Adam Hasselbalch Hansen via RT
This bug is affecting us as well. It seems to be prevalent during generation of several certificates at the same time, leading me to think it is a race condition. There is no evidence supporting it is a bug occuring every X certificates. Rather, as stated, it shows itself during multiple

Re: What are the procedures to authenticate certificate?

2013-04-11 Thread Patrick Patterson
Hi all, To properly validate the certificate, the steps in RFC5280 Section 6 need to be followed. This allows for validation of the certificate, as well as the chain back to a trusted Root. OpenSSL 1.0.1 has most of the pieces in place to do this, but there are a few areas where you would

RE: What are the procedures to authenticate certificate?

2013-04-11 Thread Salz, Rich
There are a number of concepts that are related, but they are different, and it (can be) important to keep them straight. Proof of possession -- how do you know that someone who gave you a cert has the private key? This seems to be what the OP was writing about. Conceptually, you give them

Re: [openssl.org #2051] [PATCH] IPv6 support for s_client and s_server

2013-04-11 Thread Dan Mahoney, System Admin
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013, Michael Tuexen wrote: The main point is whether the OpenSSL maintainers are interested in IPv6 support or not. If they are, the patch can be optimized in whatever way they want. I they are not, the patch goes nowhere, so optimizing it doesn't make much sense... Best

Re: [openssl.org #2051] [PATCH] IPv6 support for s_client and s_server

2013-04-11 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Thursday, April 11, 2013 9:37 AM -0700 Dan Mahoney, System Admin d...@prime.gushi.org wrote: I would love it if the maintainers would actually come forward and give a direct answer on whether or not they're interested. +1 --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Sr. Member of Technical Staff

Re: [openssl.org #2051] [PATCH] IPv6 support for s_client and s_server

2013-04-11 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: --On Thursday, April 11, 2013 9:37 AM -0700 Dan Mahoney, System Admin d...@prime.gushi.org wrote: I would love it if the maintainers would actually come forward and give a direct answer on whether or not they're interested. +1 Well I'm

RE: [openssl.org #2051] [PATCH] IPv6 support for s_client and s_server

2013-04-11 Thread Paul Suhler
Is there a target date for releasing 1.0.2? Thanks, Paul -Original Message- From: owner-openssl-...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Dr. Stephen Henson Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 11:06 AM To: openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2051]

RE: change in x509 -CA in 1.0.1?: doesn't encode new Issuer

2013-04-11 Thread Dave Thompson
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Salz, Rich Sent: Tuesday, 09 April, 2013 12:55 -dev added, I think this is a bug This pair of commands used to work as expected, but in 1.0.0 and later the resulting cert is self-signed, and not signed by the CA key. ITYM 1.0.1 as per subject.

Re: [openssl.org #2051] [PATCH] IPv6 support for s_client and s_server

2013-04-11 Thread Balakumaran Kannan
Thanks Steve for showing interest on this. And I think we could start another thread discussing this patch and improving it. Regards, Bala