Hello again!
Here is a second patch that improves the first one. Additionally it copies
and restores the packet
data before/after calling out async callback. However it is almost evident
for me that nothing
could overwrite `s-init_buf-data` during async handshake, so if you feel
confident about
Thanks, we're rolling a new build with it now...
-Brian
-Original Message-
From: Michael Tüxen via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 3:33 PM
To: Brian Hassink
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #3470] [BUG] DTLS abort
On 18 Aug 2014, at
Hello,
The attached patch fixes some memory leaks that were found via Coverity.
---
Kurt Cancemi
https://www.x64architecture.com
From 3d2c713113545255b61efe433e130078d4cf2e22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kurt Cancemi k...@x64architecture.com
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 20:21:33 -0400
Subject:
The attached updated patch fixes a style error.
---
Kurt Cancemi
https://www.x64architecture.com
From d112c3f7b36a60f8af109b90fe5299f7ac049cc6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kurt Cancemi k...@x64architecture.com
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 20:37:45 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Fix memory leaks.
---
Hello Michael,
We can confirm that the patch resolves the disconnect abort.
Thanks,
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Michael Tüxen via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 3:33 PM
To: Brian Hassink
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #3470]
On 28 Aug 2014, at 17:25, Brian Hassink via RT r...@openssl.org wrote:
Hello Michael,
We can confirm that the patch resolves the disconnect abort.
Great, thanks a lot for the feedback. Let me know if you have
further issues with DTLS/SCTP.
Best regards
Michael
Thanks,
Brian
On 28 Aug 2014, at 17:25, Brian Hassink via RT r...@openssl.org wrote:
Hello Michael,
We can confirm that the patch resolves the disconnect abort.
Great, thanks a lot for the feedback. Let me know if you have
further issues with DTLS/SCTP.
Best regards
Michael
Thanks,
Brian
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 03:11:14PM +0200, Kurt Cancemi via RT wrote:
The attached updated patch fixes a style error.
I still have a bunch of other patches like this to go thru, but
did a quick look at this, and at least this looks weird:
--- a/crypto/objects/obj_xref.h
+++
I ran make which regenerated the objects, thanks for pointing that
out, I attached an updated patch without the change.
---
Kurt Cancemi
https://www.x64architecture.com
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 03:11:14PM +0200, Kurt Cancemi
Oh, and I have just realized that it doesn't handle `ssl3_get_cert_verify`
case right now.
I'll figure it out tomorrow.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Fedor Indutny fe...@indutny.com wrote:
Hello again!
Here is a second patch that improves the first one. Additionally it copies
and
commit 8d4193305b1634a0fb397cb8806cd7dedbff34ef
Author: Rich Salz rs...@akamai.com
Date: Wed Aug 27 14:23:39 2014 -0400
RT3102: Document -verify_error_return flag
Also moved some options around so all the verify options.
are clumped together.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell m...@openssl.org
--
Rich
Fixed in HEAD
commit ac53354b949a252610cf987dbc875a7717f295c4
Author: l.montecchi...@gmail.com l.montecchi...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Aug 26 23:11:01 2014 -0400
RT2193: #ifdef errors in bss_dgram.c
Problem with #ifdef in the BIO_CTRL_DGRAM_MTU_DISCOVER case that
is different from the
This function act like destructor. It is really strange if destructor
doesn't delete object, if object haven't one method. Also function end with
free deallocate pointer, see OpenSSL_free. In your code you can just put
new allocation or create clear function ( I think performance doesn't
differ
commit c7497f34fbf3824dd4a0881d598e598980f2edb1
Author: Rich Salz rs...@akamai.com
Date: Thu Aug 14 10:50:26 2014 -0400
RT1665,2300: Crypto doc cleanups
RT1665: aes documentation.
Paul Green wrote a nice aes.pod file.
But we now encourage the EVP interface.
So I took his RT item and used it as
not an issue
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List
very old release. not enough information to reproduce. closing ticket.
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
old release. cannot reproduce. closing ticket.
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
old release, cannot reproduce, closing ticket.
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
working as designed and required. no bug. closing ticket.
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
Not doing this because of portability concerns.
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
20 matches
Mail list logo