Thanks Andy,
zLinux worked with no-asm thanks a ton!
I am working on HP-UX now.
Regards,
Mrunal
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Andy Polyakov ap...@openssl.org wrote:
In the ld man page, I could find help for option +nosectionmerge.
+nosectionmerge
After internal discussoin: PCKS7 is an old API, CMS_ is the way to go.
Closing this ticket.
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development
Thanks! This has now been applied to all branches.
(Original commit 2b0180c37fa6ffc48ee40caa831ca398b828e680)
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
On Sep 3, 2014, at 11:41 AM, Andy Polyakov ap...@openssl.org wrote:
In the ld man page, I could find help for option +nosectionmerge.
+nosectionmerge
With the -r option, allow procedures to be
positioned independently. The default
I am working on adding x86 libraries for OpenSSL, so that developers trying to
use it need not do the building part. Please add me to the list so that I can
understand better on how to make this contribution.
Thanks
Gayathri
Hello Rich,
Does it mean that S/MIME ops will be deprecated?
Thank you!
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Rich Salz via RT r...@openssl.org wrote:
After internal discussoin: PCKS7 is an old API, CMS_ is the way to go.
Closing this ticket.
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
This is a limitation on 32bit platforms where time_t cannot store dates past
2038.
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing
Hi Richard,
Thank you for following up. I think we are on the same page regarding
directories.
The API call involved here was SSL_add_dir_cert_subjects_to_stack, which failed
on windows.
The reason I have the LP_find_file specifically skip directories is that
directories cannot be opened as
Sorry, not enough information provided to have any hope of reproducing or
debugging this.
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development
We use sha256 by default for interoperability.
If that's not an issue, set the digest you want directly.
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
We are implementing that the IETF RFC's specify.
Closing ticket.
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
On Thu Sep 04 23:19:14 2014, rsalz wrote:
openssl uses time_t for its internal time value.
On a platform where time_t is 32 bits, the maximum time value is sometime in
the year 2038
Actually this is no longer the case. There was a time_t depencency in OpenSSL
0.9.8 and earlier which caused
12 matches
Mail list logo