Hey guys,
1.0.2-stable and master are currently broken when building with
-DOPENSSL_NO_SRTP.
Attached patches fix that.
Best regards,
Piotr Sikora
OpenSSL_1_0_2__Fix-build-with-DOPENSSL_NO_SRTP.patch
Description: Binary data
OpenSSL_master__Fix-build-with-DOPENSSL_NO_SRTP.patch
Description:
On 12/18/2014 4:41 AM, Salz, Rich wrote:
Are you trying to be proscriptive (say what people should use) or descriptive
(document what is in use)?
Yes, PKCS8-based PRIVATE KEY is better. But RSA PRIVATE KEY is in (wide) use
and should be described.
I am trying to be proscriptively
From: openssl-dev On Behalf Of Salz, Rich
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 07:42
Are you trying to be proscriptive (say what people should use) or
descriptive
(document what is in use)?
Yes, PKCS8-based PRIVATE KEY is better. But RSA PRIVATE KEY is in (wide)
use and should be described.
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 08:47:55AM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Does OpenSSL have documented someplace exactly what it means to have a
TRUSTED CERTIFICATE?
It is a certificate + auxiliary data which specifies a friendly name
plus a set of EKUs.
For example, say we're talking about a
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 07:02:29AM -0800, Sean Leonard wrote:
There is also a TRUSTED CERTIFICATE label that OpenSSL uses...I believe
this is a vendor-specific extension but now that I am spelunking through the
source code I see that it could be abused. Relevant source code/comments
say:
No, i commented out the RSA encrypt routines and several other things
that i can't/don't use. This resulted in a smaller array to search,
which led me to this problem.
I know it's no problem if you use OpenSSL the normal way. I don't call
it from my code. My code only calls methods available
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:05:32PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 08:47:55AM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Does OpenSSL have documented someplace exactly what it means to have a
TRUSTED CERTIFICATE?
It is a certificate + auxiliary data which specifies a
On Dec 19, 2014, at 11:35 AM, Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:05:32PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 08:47:55AM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Does OpenSSL have documented someplace exactly what it means to have a
TRUSTED CERTIFICATE?
Spam detection software, running on the system mta,
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
Content preview: [...]
