Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4103] Valgrind reported memory leak in X509_PUBKEY_get

Please ignore this. Issue found in user code. Thank you so much. On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Salz, Rich via RT wrote: > > I am trying figure out valgrind report leak. in openssl 1.0.1c. > > You don't have enough of the backtrace for us to reproduce it. Please add > a

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4103] Valgrind reported memory leak in X509_PUBKEY_get

closing per request of submittor. -- Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4119] DTLS resets handshake hash too frequently for ClientHello

Hi David, On 03/11/15 01:58, David Benjamin via RT wrote: > Hey folks, > > We found a small DTLS bug while writing some tests. I think it affects > 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 too, so I thought I'd send you a note. (Note sure about > master. I'm unfamiliar with the new state machine mechanism.) Just from

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4119] DTLS resets handshake hash too frequently for ClientHello

On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 04:16:37PM +, Matt Caswell via RT wrote: > One other related point is that fragmenting ClientHellos is probably a > bad idea. The whole ClientHello/HelloVerifyRequest mechanism is meant to > be implemented without storing state on the server. That isn't possible > if

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4119] DTLS resets handshake hash too frequently for ClientHello

On 03/11/15 18:28, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 04:16:37PM +, Matt Caswell via RT wrote: > >> One other related point is that fragmenting ClientHellos is probably a >> bad idea. The whole ClientHello/HelloVerifyRequest mechanism is meant to >> be implemented without

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4119] DTLS resets handshake hash too frequently for ClientHello

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:16 AM Matt Caswell via RT wrote: > Whilst investigating this I noticed another bug which is actually > probably more significant. My eyeball only look at the BoringSSL source > suggests that it is there too, so I'm not sure why you haven't seen it > in

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4119] DTLS resets handshake hash too frequently for ClientHello

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:42 PM David Benjamin wrote: > I'm not sure that fix quite works though. If BIO_flush completes > asynchronously (hrm, it's missing an rwstate update), then I believe you'll > be in a state where you *do* want to repeat the init_off / init_num

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4119] DTLS resets handshake hash too frequently for ClientHello

Hi David On 03/11/15 01:58, David Benjamin via RT wrote: > Hey folks, > > We found a small DTLS bug while writing some tests. I think it affects > 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 too, so I thought I'd send you a note. (Note sure about > master. I'm unfamiliar with the new state machine mechanism.) > > In DTLS,