Hi Matt,
We could successfully execute dynamic engine support.
Thanks for help.
One issue regarding cleanup.
When I gone through openssl cleanup (ie apps_shutdown() or engine interface
cleanup ) functionality, I see that there are two function pointers that can
set to ENGINE interface: destroy
Hello All,
Please let me know if the Openssl 1.0.2e is compatible with FIPS module
openssl-fips-2.0.10.
Your help is appreciated.
With best regards,
Ashwini V Patil
Siemens Healthcare Private Limited
HC SI DC IN H1-FH STD IBP 6
84, Hosur Road
Bengaluru 560100, Indien
Mobil: +91 9008132565
mailt
The "have-atomics" is intended to test if the callback was installed by the
user. If we're using an atomic library or compiler support, then it isn't
required since we know we've got them.
Likewise, the lock argument isn't required if atomics are used everywhere.
However, some code will need
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 09:27:16AM +1000, Paul Dale wrote:
> It will be possible to support atomics in such a way that there is no
> performance penalty for machines without them or for single threaded
> operation. My sketcy design is along the lines of adding a new API
> CRYPTO_add_atomic that ta
It will be possible to support atomics in such a way that there is no
performance penalty for machines without them or for single threaded operation.
My sketcy design is along the lines of adding a new API CRYPTO_add_atomic that
takes the same arguments as CRYPTO_add (i.e. reference to counter, v
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 11:19:32AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Maybe http://trac.mpich.org/projects/openpa/ would fit the bill?
>
> It seems to have trouble to keep up with new architectures.
New architectures are not really a problem because between a) decent
compilers with C11 and/or non-C
Agree. It will be more straight to remove the if() test here, since the later
logic will handle the inData directly if this parameter was provided.
> -Original Message-
> From: Salz, Rich via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2015 8:56 PM
> To: Long, Qin
> Cc: ope
Hi,
thanks for the detailed explanation. We can change our code to use the
BIO-functionality instead of using FILE pointers, so far this works fine
and even simplifies our code.
But two issues remain:
1. There is still no explanation on why it worked fine with Visual
Studio 2005 - 2013 (yes, che
I think that instead of the #ifdef being removed, the if() test should be
removed.
This was my mistake.
___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
The OpenSSL new release / HEAD updates removed the following comment-out
statement
in PKCS7_verify() routine, which will return error for one call if both
embedded-content and
detached data were provided.
#if 0 --> Removed
/*
* NB: this test commented out because some versions of
* Nico Williams:
> Maybe http://trac.mpich.org/projects/openpa/ would fit the bill?
It seems to have trouble to keep up with new architectures.
___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
11 matches
Mail list logo
