On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 13:44 +, Salz, Rich wrote:
> I would suggest the LAMPS WG (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/lamps/c
> harter/), which is the closest thing to PKIX these days, and perhaps
> cross-post to the SAAG mailing list the general catch-all for
> security area https://trac.tools.ietf
On 09/07/2016 12:49 AM, Leon Brits wrote:
> Hi SteveM,
>
> Yes we are copycats - thanks for making it possible.
>
> I was also amazed when I received the email very close to our final
> source code review and operational testing phase.
>
> I've used the fips_algv tests suite to have the algorith
On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 13:44 +, Salz, Rich wrote:
> I would suggest the LAMPS WG (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/lamps/c
> harter/), which is the closest thing to PKIX these days, and perhaps
> cross-post to the SAAG mailing list the general catch-all for
> security area https://trac.tools.ietf
I would suggest the LAMPS WG (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/lamps/charter/),
which is the closest thing to PKIX these days, and perhaps cross-post to the
SAAG mailing list the general catch-all for security area
https://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki.
--
Senior Architect, Akamai Tec
On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 20:20 +, Salz, Rich wrote:
> >
> > I've started collecting a certificate torture test suite at
> > http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/openconnect.git/blob/HEAD:/tests/
> > Makefile.am
>
> I think this is cool, and splitting it off is a good idea. I think
> some IETF f
