Hi,
I hope you'll see value in my patches which fix typos in the docs.
Alok
0001-Fixes-some-typos-in-doc-apps.patch
Description: Binary data
0002-Fixes-some-typos-in-doc-ssl.patch
Description: Binary data
___
openssl-dev mailing list
To
Two more. For 0004-Corrects-port-names-in-documentation-for-BIO_set_con.patch,
it is probably worth checking that my deletion is correct.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Alok Menghrajani via RT
r...@openssl.org wrote:
Hi,
I hope you'll see value in my patches which fix typos in the docs
Hey,
The current documentation (hosted at
https://www.openssl.org/docs/HOWTO/certificates.txt) contains a few
spelling. It also contains placeholder references to documents which
now exist. Attached is my attempt to improve the doc.
Alok
0001-Improves-certificates-HOWTO.patch
Description:
Great. There is one minor typo left, patch attached.
Alok
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Richard Levitte via RT r...@openssl.org
wrote:
I just read them through, and it looks good, I just needed to do a couple
of
layout adjustments. Committed.
Thank you.
On Sat Nov 15 11:17:51 2014,
Hi,
The current documentation (hosted at
https://www.openssl.org/docs/HOWTO/proxy_certificates.txt) contains a bunch
of spelling and grammar mistakes. I also found it hard to understand some
paragraphs, so here is my attempt to improve its overall readability.
Alok
Hi,
I didn't get any response to my previous email regarding checking the
encrypt flag when doing EVP encryption or decryption operations, nor did I
get any comments on the patch. I have the feeling I incorrectly formatted
my patch, so I'm re-doing it.
Alok
Hi,
I didn't get any response to my previous email regarding checking the
encrypt flag when doing EVP encryption or decryption operations, nor did I
get any comments on the patch. I have the feeling I incorrectly formatted
my patch, so I'm re-doing it.
Alok
The doc says that EVP_EncryptUpdate's outl should contain inl +
cipher_block_size - 1 bytes, but the output buffer is called out, not outl.
Patch is attached to this email and also viewable on github:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/195
Alok
I created a pull request about a week ago
(https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/172) but it seems things work
better if I send an email also?
I believe EVP should make it hard to shoot yourself in the foot, so
this change ensures that a user cannot accidentally decrypt data with
an encryption
