On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 02:00:43PM -0500, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
>
> Thanks for describing what you're up to and thanks (in advance) for
> contributing your implementation(s). OpenSSL is used for a lot more
> than building free webservers, despite misconceptions to the contrary,
> and having an reaso
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Vaughan
> So, my question is simply "Has anyone seen this problem before?".
Have you checked the FAQ?
http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.8/ssl_faq.html#ToC49
Specifically the first one about nokeepa
I've was getting ready to install OpenSSL 0.9.6a with mod_ssl, and while
running the test suite the BN_sqr test failed.
However, the second time I ran it, all tests completed successfully.
Not convinced, I started running test_bn multiple times (cd test ; make
test_bn && make test_bn && make tes
>
> The next (hopefully real) release is scheduled for Tuesday
> 2001-04-03. To make
> sure that it will work correctly, please test this version
> (especially on less
> common platforms), and report any problems to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Looks good from here on my IRIX systems.
Thanks,
-Dave
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> > From: Andy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > appro> Keep in mind that no-asm on MIPS costs almost 4 times in
> > performance. In
> >
> > Well, I think we should put correct function before
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Allen
>
> Well, that patch was for the MIPS assembler stuff. Can't quite
> use it directly on my Alpha. :-)
Duh, why did I think that Alpha was MIPS?
> I reconfigured with no-asm, re-did the ma
Hi,
This sounds related to the bug found under the topic "Irix fault?". See if
the patch posted under that by Andy Polyakov fixes the build for you...
-Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Allen
>
> Beta2 compiles fine on my
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> From: Andy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> appro> Keep in mind that no-asm on MIPS costs almost 4 times in
> performance. In
>
> Well, I think we should put correct function before performance :-
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard Levitte - VMS
>
> From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> levitte> David, you told us that 0.9.6a beta2 failed on Irix
> 6.5.11. Have you
> levitte> tried to configure with
So there's at least a handful people who got the same exact mail I got,
smells like spam to me. At least Dan doesn't appear to have forged any
headers to do it.
He appears to only spam those who have posted to the list recently.
Since he appears to be a real person, I'd feel much better if Dan
t;; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:04:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: by smtpmail.certicom.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.4 (830.2 3-23-1999))
id 85256A17.006954A3 ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:10:29 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: CERTICOM
From: "Daniel Rupinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "David Rees" <[EM
If there's any way I can help debug this, let me know.
-Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard Levitte - VMS
>
> From: "David Rees" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> drees> The Square
The Square test is still failing on IRIX 6.5.11 (irix-mips3-cc) when
compiling with both the native cc and gcc 2.95.2 from freeware.sgi.com:
starting big number library test, could take a while...
test BN_add
test BN_sub
test BN_lshift1
test BN_lshift (fixed)
test BN_lshift
test BN_rshift1
test B
On IRIX 6.5.11 when running 'make test' I get the following test failure
when compiling with either cc or gcc2.95.2:
starting big number library test, could take a while...
test BN_add
test BN_sub
test BN_lshift1
test BN_lshift (fixed)
test BN_lshift
test BN_rshift1
test BN_rshift
test BN_sqr
Squ
14 matches
Mail list logo
