[openssl.org #2772] Bug w/ patch: OpenSSL 1.0.1 rejects empty NewSessionTicket

2012-03-23 Thread Jack Lloyd via RT
RFC 5077 section 3.3 says: If the server determines that it does not want to include a ticket after it has included the SessionTicket extension in the ServerHello, then it sends a zero-length ticket in the NewSessionTicket handshake message. However an OpenSSL 1.0.1 client will

[openssl.org #2240] Missing Supported Point Formats Extension in ServerHello should be ignored

2010-04-20 Thread Jack Lloyd via RT
RFC 4492 says: A client that receives a ServerHello message containing a Supported Point Formats Extension MUST respect the server's choice of point formats during the handshake (cf. Sections 5.6 and 5.7). If no Supported Point Formats Extension is received with the ServerHello,

Re: [openssl.org #960] OpenSSL 0.9.7e fails on Linux

2004-10-27 Thread Jack Lloyd via RT
Here's a WAG: ldd the test binaries on the FC2 box -- it's possible they ended up getting linked with the FC2 OpenSSL libs. If that's not it, I'm out of ideas. :) -Jack On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 02:57:08PM +0200, Andreas M. Kirchwitz via RT wrote: Hi OpenSSL team! I downloaded the new

[openssl.org #895] AEP engine breaks on Linux with pthreads

2004-06-11 Thread Jack Lloyd via RT
Summary: Threaded applications using the AEP engine break badly on Linux. The AEP engine has the following code to see if the application has forked, and if so, shutdown and reinitialize the library (in aep_get_connection, crypto/engine/hw_aep.c): /*Check if this is the first time this

Re: [openssl.org #328] DH_compute_key incompatable with PKCS #3

2002-12-04 Thread Jack Lloyd via RT
for this fix. [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Nov 14 19:05:29 2002]: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 14 Nov 2002 18:54:21 +0100 (MET), Jack Lloyd via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rt Looks like the 1.1 TLS draft spec uses the same wording. Perhaps someone rt should contact the TLS WG and ask

Re: [openssl.org #328] DH_compute_key incompatable with PKCS #3

2002-11-14 Thread Jack Lloyd via RT
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: Can it be shown that this is a problem at a TLS level? I'd hate to make the proposed change just to discover that it breaks interoperability with other TLS clients and servers. RFC 2246 is very vague: 8.1.2. Diffie-Hellman A

[openssl.org #328] DH_compute_key incompatable with PKCS #3

2002-11-04 Thread Jack Lloyd via RT
Hi, It seems that DH_compute_key is slightly incompatable with PKCS #3, if the derived secret z is too small. In particular, section 8.3 of PKCS #3 Integer-to-octet-string conversion, specifies that that output of the operation should be exactly k bytes long (where k is the number of bytes in