No matter. As soon as we have to perform a new build (will be done on Visual
Studio 2015 later this year) and I discover the same issue, I will report it.
Kees
-Original Message-
From: Rich Salz via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 22:16
To: Kees Dekker
Cc:
Hi,
It unfortunately took a long time that I was able to check the problem below
again. The proposed fix is incorrect. Because the .mak file is generated by
util/mk1mf.pl, the change should be done on top of that file. Both for
openssl1.0.1e as well as for openssl1.0.1g the following diff can
Hi,
It may be useful to add the .pdb file to the lib directory in the install
target. Windows build that adopt OpenSSL may benefit from it. When using
ssleay32.lib and/or libeay32.lib then Visual Studio may complain about missing
symbol information. That information is in the pdb file. If a
Hi,
I used a slightly modified script:
if (@ARGV[0]) {
while() { print foo.$_; }
} else {
print Running on $^O, using: $^X, version $]\n;
open STDOUT,| \$^X\ $0 -;
print bar\n;
close STDOUT;
}
Results (the first sentence is comments of me
I think you can indeed remove ar rs completely for 64-bit sparc too... In a 10
year timeframe some things may have changed... It is really impressive that you
found something in your archive that happened so long ago. If you put Solaris
10 as minimum OS version, then you can safely remove that
Andy,
Thanks for explanation.
As answer on your question whether ml64.exe is existent: when setting Visual
Studio 2010 (SP1) x64 command line environment, ml64.exe is accessible via the
path (in c:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio
10.0\VC\bin\amd64\ml64.exe).
Microsoft has
It is indeed the quoting of the perl command interpreter issue.
I also work often on *nix platforms, and tested with \$^X\, which worked. But
I can’t guarantee that too for all *nix flavors... It may be worth trying it
(unless someone else complains).
If you are unsure for a certain *nix
FYI:
When building OpenSSL, using the solaris64-sparcv9-cc config, then RANLIB uses
ar -rs as RANLIB command. Solaris 10 on UltraSparc (in my case a V440 system)
suffers from a bug in:
/usr/ccs/bin/ar:
SunOS 5.10 Generic 144500-19 Jul 2011
/etc/release:
Oracle
Hi,
I noticed that the Microsoft Assembler compiler support has gone, however, I
also found that ms\do_ms.bat does NOT use assembly (no-asm flag is used), while
ms\do_win64a.bat silently expects nasm compiler (according to INSTALL.WIN32 the
only supported assembly compiler). Similar is true
Hi,
In addition to my previous email:
The utils\pl\VC-32.pl always add (not taking care for no-asm option) the
following line
$banner.='___' if ($FLAVOR =~ /WIN64/);
CRYPTOOBJ=ms\uptable.obj $(CRYPTOOBJ)
Although I did not test it, I can imagine that the 32-bit build also likes
Hi,
Openssl1.0.0d contains a typo in a ifndef directive, see transscript below.
This bug pops up in a build on a Tru64 V5.1B system.
DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -c -o bn_asm.o bn_asm.c
/bin/perl asm/alpha-mont.pl | cc -E - | tee alpha-mont.s /dev/null
cc: Warning: , line 1: indef is an invalid
Just one idea, which popped up today.
What about of using UuidCreate() function, see:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa379205(VS.85).aspx
In our case, our software runs as a service, in its own desktop/winstation.
That desktop does not have a bitmap at all, or if it has one, it is
Hi,
Yes, this patch worked, thanks, i.e. my application to not crash anymore upon
startup/init.
Unfortunatelly, I was still not able to file a defect to Sun. I will still try
to file the conflict with -lmalloc + ldevinfo to Sun, but I'm not sure whether
this will succeed.
Anyhow, the
I will try. I will send an update when done.
Kees
-Original Message-
From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Tuesday, 07 September, 2010 09:47
To: Kees Dekker
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2321] bug report: core dump on
Hi,
What do you mean with the last paragraph in your email?
Do you like to make a fix, in such way that the sun way becomes more similar to
the linux way?
I will update when I can get a fix from SUN. In the meanwhile - since we can't
easily set env.vars., because our program is a network
Hi,
Why does Solaris 10 on SparcIII not suffer from this problem, is unclear to me.
We always use -lmalloc for our application, and have only one solaris 10 build
(used on all Solaris systems, regardless the processor type).
Unfortunatelly, (our) support for Solaris is system limited, and
-Original Message-
From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Monday, 23 August, 2010 17:23
To: Kees Dekker
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2321] bug report: core dump on
OPENSSL_cpuid_setup() on Solaris 10 with a Sun Enterprise 450
Addition: building the openssl application with -lmalloc results in the same
coredump
May be dlopen(libdevinfo.so.1) and using -lmalloc does not work together (at
least on UltraSparcII).
Kees
-Original Message-
From: Kees Dekker
Sent: Tuesday, 24 August, 2010 14:25
To:
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Saturday, 21 August, 2010 14:42
To: Kees Dekker
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2321] bug report: core dump on
OPENSSL_cpuid_setup() on Solaris 10 with a Sun Enterprise
Hi,
The 32-bit of openSSL 1.0.0a (solaris-sparcv9-cc configuration) coredumps upon
initialization. The stack trace is (of our product binary):
#0 0xff360c90 in free_unlocked () from /usr/lib/libmalloc.so.1
#1 0xff360b78 in free () from /usr/lib/libmalloc.so.1
#2 0x007107a4 in
Hi,
I noticed that the output directories of any prefixed (--prefix) OpenSSL build
for some Unix 64-bit flavors changed.
In the past (at least with openSSL openssl-0.9.8k), after calling gmake
install, the include files were in prefix/include, the libraries in prefix/lib.
Due to the changed
-Original Message-
From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2010 23:33
To: Kees Dekker
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2194] Unwanted dependencies to user32.dll
I agree that OPENSSL_isservice() cannot be changed,
???
-Original Message-
From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 12:08
To: Kees Dekker
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2194] Unwanted dependencies to user32.dll
May be there is another method to check wether a windows
-Original Message-
From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 22:48
To: Kees Dekker
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2194] Unwanted dependencies to user32.dll
I agree that OPENSSL_isservice() cannot be changed,
???
I agree that OPENSSL_isservice() cannot be changed,
??? My suggestion for *you* was to modify it to
unconditionally return 1...
Our application can both run in foreground and in service context. So simply
changing to return 1 is not possible.
May be there is another method to check
-Original Message-
From: Kees Dekker
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 22:53
To: 'r...@openssl.org'
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: RE: [openssl.org #2194] Unwanted dependencies to user32.dll
-Original Message-
From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Hi,
When building openSSL on Windows with:
* CONFIG=VC-WIN64A or CONFIG=VC-WIN32
* no-shared no-threads -DWINVER==0x0501 -D_CRT_NON_CONFORMING_SWPRINTFS
* With Visual Studio 2005
I get dependencies to user32.dll, when using libeay32.lib, e.g:
2libeay32.lib(rand_win.obj) :
-Original Message-
From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 22:23
To: Kees Dekker
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2194] Unwanted dependencies to user32.dll
When building openSSL on Windows with:
*
Hi,
Many thanks for this info.
Thanks,
Kees
BTW. the lowest supported linux version for Suse is Suse 9, which has gcc
3.3.3. The -m32 is already supported there. You may consider to put gcc 3.3.3
as minimum version? Unfortunatelly, I don't have a 64-bit box with this
compiler to test it.
Hi,
The build of 32-bit openSSL (openssl-0.9.8k) fails on x64 systems with the
following error (and more similar errors like these):
x86cpuid-elf.s:13: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'
This problem can be fixed by adding -m32 to Configure for the linux-elf
configuration, see the
30 matches
Mail list logo
