podlators 2.5.0 has switched to dying on POD syntax errors. This means
that a bunch of long-standing erroneous POD in the openssl documentation
now leads to fatal errors from pod2man, halting installation.

Unfortunately POD constraints mean that you have to sort numeric lists
in ascending order if they start with 1: you cannot do 1, 0, 2 even if
you want 1 to appear first. I've reshuffled such (alas, I wish there
were a better way but I don't know of one).
---
Applies against 1.0.1, 1.0.2, and master, though it only fixes POD
errors known to exist in 1.0.1.

 doc/crypto/X509_STORE_CTX_get_error.pod   |  2 ++
 doc/ssl/SSL_CTX_set_client_CA_list.pod    |  8 ++++----
 doc/ssl/SSL_CTX_use_psk_identity_hint.pod |  4 ++++
 doc/ssl/SSL_accept.pod                    | 10 +++++-----
 doc/ssl/SSL_connect.pod                   | 10 +++++-----
 doc/ssl/SSL_do_handshake.pod              | 10 +++++-----
 doc/ssl/SSL_shutdown.pod                  | 10 +++++-----
 7 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/crypto/X509_STORE_CTX_get_error.pod 
b/doc/crypto/X509_STORE_CTX_get_error.pod
index a883f6c..60e8332 100644
--- a/doc/crypto/X509_STORE_CTX_get_error.pod
+++ b/doc/crypto/X509_STORE_CTX_get_error.pod
@@ -278,6 +278,8 @@ happen if extended CRL checking is enabled.
 an application specific error. This will never be returned unless explicitly
 set by an application.
 
+=back
+
 =head1 NOTES
 
 The above functions should be used instead of directly referencing the fields
diff --git a/doc/ssl/SSL_CTX_set_client_CA_list.pod 
b/doc/ssl/SSL_CTX_set_client_CA_list.pod
index 632b556..5e66133 100644
--- a/doc/ssl/SSL_CTX_set_client_CA_list.pod
+++ b/doc/ssl/SSL_CTX_set_client_CA_list.pod
@@ -66,16 +66,16 @@ values:
 
 =over 4
 
-=item 1
-
-The operation succeeded.
-
 =item 0
 
 A failure while manipulating the STACK_OF(X509_NAME) object occurred or
 the X509_NAME could not be extracted from B<cacert>. Check the error stack
 to find out the reason.
 
+=item 1
+
+The operation succeeded.
+
 =back
 
 =head1 EXAMPLES
diff --git a/doc/ssl/SSL_CTX_use_psk_identity_hint.pod 
b/doc/ssl/SSL_CTX_use_psk_identity_hint.pod
index b80e25b..7e60df5 100644
--- a/doc/ssl/SSL_CTX_use_psk_identity_hint.pod
+++ b/doc/ssl/SSL_CTX_use_psk_identity_hint.pod
@@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ SSL_CTX_use_psk_identity_hint() and 
SSL_use_psk_identity_hint() return
 
 Return values from the server callback are interpreted as follows:
 
+=over 4
+
 =item > 0
 
 PSK identity was found and the server callback has provided the PSK
@@ -99,4 +101,6 @@ completely.
 PSK identity was not found. An "unknown_psk_identity" alert message
 will be sent and the connection setup fails.
 
+=back
+
 =cut
diff --git a/doc/ssl/SSL_accept.pod b/doc/ssl/SSL_accept.pod
index cc724c0..b1c34d1 100644
--- a/doc/ssl/SSL_accept.pod
+++ b/doc/ssl/SSL_accept.pod
@@ -44,17 +44,17 @@ The following return values can occur:
 
 =over 4
 
-=item 1
-
-The TLS/SSL handshake was successfully completed, a TLS/SSL connection has been
-established.
-
 =item 0
 
 The TLS/SSL handshake was not successful but was shut down controlled and
 by the specifications of the TLS/SSL protocol. Call SSL_get_error() with the
 return value B<ret> to find out the reason.
 
+=item 1
+
+The TLS/SSL handshake was successfully completed, a TLS/SSL connection has been
+established.
+
 =item E<lt>0
 
 The TLS/SSL handshake was not successful because a fatal error occurred either
diff --git a/doc/ssl/SSL_connect.pod b/doc/ssl/SSL_connect.pod
index cc56ebb..946ca89 100644
--- a/doc/ssl/SSL_connect.pod
+++ b/doc/ssl/SSL_connect.pod
@@ -41,17 +41,17 @@ The following return values can occur:
 
 =over 4
 
-=item 1
-
-The TLS/SSL handshake was successfully completed, a TLS/SSL connection has been
-established.
-
 =item 0
 
 The TLS/SSL handshake was not successful but was shut down controlled and
 by the specifications of the TLS/SSL protocol. Call SSL_get_error() with the
 return value B<ret> to find out the reason.
 
+=item 1
+
+The TLS/SSL handshake was successfully completed, a TLS/SSL connection has been
+established.
+
 =item E<lt>0
 
 The TLS/SSL handshake was not successful, because a fatal error occurred either
diff --git a/doc/ssl/SSL_do_handshake.pod b/doc/ssl/SSL_do_handshake.pod
index 2435764..7f8cf24 100644
--- a/doc/ssl/SSL_do_handshake.pod
+++ b/doc/ssl/SSL_do_handshake.pod
@@ -45,17 +45,17 @@ The following return values can occur:
 
 =over 4
 
-=item 1
-
-The TLS/SSL handshake was successfully completed, a TLS/SSL connection has been
-established.
-
 =item 0
 
 The TLS/SSL handshake was not successful but was shut down controlled and
 by the specifications of the TLS/SSL protocol. Call SSL_get_error() with the
 return value B<ret> to find out the reason.
 
+=item 1
+
+The TLS/SSL handshake was successfully completed, a TLS/SSL connection has been
+established.
+
 =item E<lt>0
 
 The TLS/SSL handshake was not successful because a fatal error occurred either
diff --git a/doc/ssl/SSL_shutdown.pod b/doc/ssl/SSL_shutdown.pod
index 89911ac..42a89b7 100644
--- a/doc/ssl/SSL_shutdown.pod
+++ b/doc/ssl/SSL_shutdown.pod
@@ -92,11 +92,6 @@ The following return values can occur:
 
 =over 4
 
-=item 1
-
-The shutdown was successfully completed. The "close notify" alert was sent
-and the peer's "close notify" alert was received.
-
 =item 0
 
 The shutdown is not yet finished. Call SSL_shutdown() for a second time,
@@ -104,6 +99,11 @@ if a bidirectional shutdown shall be performed.
 The output of L<SSL_get_error(3)|SSL_get_error(3)> may be misleading, as an
 erroneous SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL may be flagged even though no error occurred.
 
+=item 1
+
+The shutdown was successfully completed. The "close notify" alert was sent
+and the peer's "close notify" alert was received.
+
 =item -1
 
 The shutdown was not successful because a fatal error occurred either
-- 
1.8.1.160.g9d4f471

______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           majord...@openssl.org

Reply via email to