Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4094] Nonsensical pointer comparison in PACKET_buf_init

2015-10-22 Thread stefan.n...@t-online.de via RT
Hi, Wouldn't if ( UINTPTR_MAX - (uintptr_t) buffer < len) be closer to the intention of the original check? Or is this undefined behaviour as well and I stupidly missed that fact? Regards, Stefan ___ openssl-dev mailing

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4067] Bug - Header files in include folder differ for different extractiing methods

2015-10-02 Thread stefan.n...@t-online.de via RT
Hi, > I downloaded OpenSSL 1.0.0s.tar.gz and extracted files using following three > ways. > The header files in "openssl 1.0.0s\include\openssl" folder are different. > (snipp) > Is this a bug in packaging? What is the expected results on Windows? At first glance, one could say, it's a b

[openssl.org #3598] Windows Phone & OpenSSL.

2014-11-11 Thread stefan.n...@t-online.de via RT
Hi, While everyone is talking about removing old platforms and cleaning code, I'm going to suggest adding yet another (sub-)platform and adding (a bit) to all those #ifdef's (talk about bad timing...). I have a complete patch which at least gets everything to compile, but for

AW: [openssl.org #3539] x509 application supports additional fingerprint digests (sha2) not shown in help.

2014-09-24 Thread stefan.n...@t-online.de via RT
Hi, > This is fixed post-1.0.2, where the message says "any supported digest" > See https://github.com/akamai/openssl/tree/rsalz-monolith for a preview. Sorry to say something you apparently don't want to hear (for completely understandable reasons), but as much as I appreciate getti