On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:12:01AM +0100, M?rten Wikstr?m wrote:
>
> Ok. Well I guess it could be solved by letting the Configure script
> detect whether make supports the + notion and assign a variable, say
> R, either + or the empty string. Then in Makefile.org you could use
> $(R) at the start o
Ok. Well I guess it could be solved by letting the Configure script
detect whether make supports the + notion and assign a variable, say
R, either + or the empty string. Then in Makefile.org you could use
$(R) at the start of the rules instead of +.
Cheers,
Mårten
2010/12/9 Richard Levitte :
> A
Ah, got it.
Trouble is, though, that Makefile.org is made to work with other make
implementations as well. Adding gnuisms in it will create problems.
Cheers,
Richard
In message on
Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:40:29 +0100, Mårten Wikström said:
marten> Yes, it is a GNU Make feature as far as I know. T
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 03:40:29PM +0100, M?rten Wikstr?m wrote:
> Yes, it is a GNU Make feature as far as I know. The + tells make that
> the rule is recursive and thus propagates the -j magic to sub makes.
> Normally it handles this magic automatically but for this to work you
> have to call sub
Yes, it is a GNU Make feature as far as I know. The + tells make that
the rule is recursive and thus propagates the -j magic to sub makes.
Normally it handles this magic automatically but for this to work you
have to call sub makes with $(MAKE), if you use anything else you
manually have to mark th
Hmmm, I'm not aware of the meaning of a '+' at the start of command
lines, never seen it before. I can't see any explanation in the GNU
make manual, so I assume it's another implementation of make that
supports this.
Please enlighten me.
Cheers,
Richard
In message on
Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:01:48
Hi!
With the attached patch I can build openssl in parallel. Perhaps it is
useful for someone else as well.
Cheers,
Mårten
Index: openssl-0.9.8q/Makefile.org
===
--- openssl-0.9.8q.orig/Makefile.org 2010-12-08 11:13:10.381185998
