On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 06:21:13AM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 02:44:32PM -0800, Zi Lin wrote:
>
> > Hi OpenSSL devs,
> >
> > I want to propose a patch that makes OpenSSL compatible with
> > asynchronous session lookup during session resumption.
>
> I think this is a
On 06/01/16 06:14, Zi Lin wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> thanks for your time. I am glad to see the big efforts done to make
> OpenSSL code better in the master branch (and v1.1.0+). I will find a
> way to start working on the master branch. A quick glance into the
> master branch state machine: the
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 02:44:32PM -0800, Zi Lin wrote:
> Hi OpenSSL devs,
>
> I want to propose a patch that makes OpenSSL compatible with
> asynchronous session lookup during session resumption.
I think this is a bad idea. If you want distributed session caches
use session tickets, and
Hi Matt,
thanks for your time. I am glad to see the big efforts done to make
OpenSSL code better in the master branch (and v1.1.0+). I will find a
way to start working on the master branch. A quick glance into the
master branch state machine: the get_prev_session call happens in
process_message
On 05/01/16 22:44, Zi Lin wrote:
> Hi OpenSSL devs,
>
> I want to propose a patch that makes OpenSSL compatible with
> asynchronous session lookup during session resumption. Currently, the
> session lookup expects the session callback to return immediately with
> success or failure. Now consider
Hi OpenSSL devs,
I want to propose a patch that makes OpenSSL compatible with
asynchronous session lookup during session resumption. Currently, the
session lookup expects the session callback to return immediately with
success or failure. Now consider a cluster of hosts that want to pool
the ssl
