Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl/openssl] ABI compatibility 1.0.0-->1.0.1-->1.0.2

2017-02-27 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On 02/26/2017 02:10 AM, Richard Levitte wrote: > In message on Fri, 27 Jan > 2017 10:54:35 -0600, Benjamin Kaduk via openssl-dev > said: > > openssl-dev> There was some discussion about 1.0.1 being EoL on a FreeBSD >

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl/openssl] ABI compatibility 1.0.0-->1.0.1-->1.0.2

2017-02-27 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On 02/26/2017 07:26 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > It's normal that you might see some symbols removed if you compare > something like 1.0.1t against 1.0.2, but it shouldn't when compared > to 1.0.2k. I agree, and figured this out at some point after I sent the initial query. Given the low interest

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl/openssl] ABI compatibility 1.0.0-->1.0.1-->1.0.2

2017-02-26 Thread Andrey Ponomarenko
26.02.2017, 16:27, "Kurt Roeckx":> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 09:26:06AM +0300, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:>>  31.01.2017, 10:21, "Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos":>>  > On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 10:54 -0600, Benjamin Kaduk via openssl-dev>>  > wrote:>>  >>  [moving from github to -dev]>>    >>  On 01/27/2017

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl/openssl] ABI compatibility 1.0.0-->1.0.1-->1.0.2

2017-02-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 09:26:06AM +0300, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote: > 31.01.2017, 10:21, "Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos": > > On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 10:54 -0600, Benjamin Kaduk via openssl-dev > > wrote: > >>  [moving from github to -dev] > >> > >>  On 01/27/2017 07:36 AM, mattcaswell wrote: > >>  >

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl/openssl] ABI compatibility 1.0.0-->1.0.1-->1.0.2

2017-02-26 Thread Richard Levitte
In message on Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:54:35 -0600, Benjamin Kaduk via openssl-dev said: openssl-dev> There was some discussion about 1.0.1 being EoL on a FreeBSD list [0], openssl-dev> and whether it would make sense to

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl/openssl] ABI compatibility 1.0.0-->1.0.1-->1.0.2

2017-02-25 Thread Andrey Ponomarenko
31.01.2017, 10:21, "Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos": > On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 10:54 -0600, Benjamin Kaduk via openssl-dev > wrote: >>  [moving from github to -dev] >> >>  On 01/27/2017 07:36 AM, mattcaswell wrote: >>  > 1.0.2 is the software version. >>  > The numbers on the end of lbssl.so.1.0.0 refer to

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl/openssl] ABI compatibility 1.0.0-->1.0.1-->1.0.2

2017-01-30 Thread Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 10:54 -0600, Benjamin Kaduk via openssl-dev wrote: > [moving from github to -dev] > > On 01/27/2017 07:36 AM, mattcaswell wrote: > > 1.0.2 is the software version. > > The numbers on the end of lbssl.so.1.0.0 refer to the ABI version - > > which is different. Software

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl/openssl] ABI compatibility 1.0.0-->1.0.1-->1.0.2

2017-01-27 Thread Benjamin Kaduk via openssl-dev
sage d'origine- > De : openssl-dev [mailto:openssl-dev-boun...@openssl.org] De la part de > Salz, Rich via openssl-dev > Envoyé : vendredi 27 janvier 2017 19:49 > À : Kaduk, Ben; openssl-dev@openssl.org > Objet : Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl/openssl] ABI compatibility > 1.0.0--&g

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl/openssl] ABI compatibility 1.0.0-->1.0.1-->1.0.2

2017-01-27 Thread Michel
, Ben; openssl-dev@openssl.org Objet : Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl/openssl] ABI compatibility 1.0.0-->1.0.1-->1.0.2 The tool looks good, but either you didn't find the right link, or it's got bugs. Of the four symbols you found, ASN1_STRING_clear_free(), SRP_user_pwd_free(), and SRP_VBASE_get1_b

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl/openssl] ABI compatibility 1.0.0-->1.0.1-->1.0.2

2017-01-27 Thread Salz, Rich via openssl-dev
The tool looks good, but either you didn't find the right link, or it's got bugs. Of the four symbols you found, ASN1_STRING_clear_free(), SRP_user_pwd_free(), and SRP_VBASE_get1_by_user() all exist; only ENGINE_load_rsax() was removed. -- Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies Member,

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl/openssl] ABI compatibility 1.0.0-->1.0.1-->1.0.2

2017-01-27 Thread Matt Caswell
On 27/01/17 16:54, Benjamin Kaduk via openssl-dev wrote: > [moving from github to -dev] > > On 01/27/2017 07:36 AM, mattcaswell wrote: >> >> 1.0.2 is the software version. >> The numbers on the end of lbssl.so.1.0.0 refer to the ABI version - >> which is different. Software version 1.0.2 is a

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl/openssl] ABI compatibility 1.0.0-->1.0.1-->1.0.2

2017-01-27 Thread Benjamin Kaduk via openssl-dev
[moving from github to -dev] On 01/27/2017 07:36 AM, mattcaswell wrote: > > 1.0.2 is the software version. > The numbers on the end of lbssl.so.1.0.0 refer to the ABI version - > which is different. Software version 1.0.2 is a drop in replacement > for 1.0.1, which is a drop in replacement for