On 02/26/2017 02:10 AM, Richard Levitte wrote:
> In message on Fri, 27 Jan
> 2017 10:54:35 -0600, Benjamin Kaduk via openssl-dev
> said:
>
> openssl-dev> There was some discussion about 1.0.1 being EoL on a FreeBSD
>
On 02/26/2017 07:26 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> It's normal that you might see some symbols removed if you compare
> something like 1.0.1t against 1.0.2, but it shouldn't when compared
> to 1.0.2k.
I agree, and figured this out at some point after I sent the initial
query. Given the low interest
26.02.2017, 16:27, "Kurt Roeckx":> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 09:26:06AM +0300, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:>> 31.01.2017, 10:21, "Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos":>> > On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 10:54 -0600, Benjamin Kaduk via openssl-dev>> > wrote:>> >> [moving from github to -dev]>> >> On 01/27/2017
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 09:26:06AM +0300, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
> 31.01.2017, 10:21, "Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos":
> > On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 10:54 -0600, Benjamin Kaduk via openssl-dev
> > wrote:
> >> [moving from github to -dev]
> >>
> >> On 01/27/2017 07:36 AM, mattcaswell wrote:
> >> >
In message on Fri, 27 Jan
2017 10:54:35 -0600, Benjamin Kaduk via openssl-dev
said:
openssl-dev> There was some discussion about 1.0.1 being EoL on a FreeBSD list
[0],
openssl-dev> and whether it would make sense to
31.01.2017, 10:21, "Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos":
> On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 10:54 -0600, Benjamin Kaduk via openssl-dev
> wrote:
>> [moving from github to -dev]
>>
>> On 01/27/2017 07:36 AM, mattcaswell wrote:
>> > 1.0.2 is the software version.
>> > The numbers on the end of lbssl.so.1.0.0 refer to
On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 10:54 -0600, Benjamin Kaduk via openssl-dev
wrote:
> [moving from github to -dev]
>
> On 01/27/2017 07:36 AM, mattcaswell wrote:
> > 1.0.2 is the software version.
> > The numbers on the end of lbssl.so.1.0.0 refer to the ABI version -
> > which is different. Software
sage d'origine-
> De : openssl-dev [mailto:openssl-dev-boun...@openssl.org] De la part de
> Salz, Rich via openssl-dev
> Envoyé : vendredi 27 janvier 2017 19:49
> À : Kaduk, Ben; openssl-dev@openssl.org
> Objet : Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl/openssl] ABI compatibility
> 1.0.0--&g
, Ben; openssl-dev@openssl.org
Objet : Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl/openssl] ABI compatibility
1.0.0-->1.0.1-->1.0.2
The tool looks good, but either you didn't find the right link, or it's got
bugs. Of the four symbols you found, ASN1_STRING_clear_free(),
SRP_user_pwd_free(), and SRP_VBASE_get1_b
The tool looks good, but either you didn't find the right link, or it's got
bugs. Of the four symbols you found, ASN1_STRING_clear_free(),
SRP_user_pwd_free(), and SRP_VBASE_get1_by_user() all exist; only
ENGINE_load_rsax() was removed.
--
Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
Member,
On 27/01/17 16:54, Benjamin Kaduk via openssl-dev wrote:
> [moving from github to -dev]
>
> On 01/27/2017 07:36 AM, mattcaswell wrote:
>>
>> 1.0.2 is the software version.
>> The numbers on the end of lbssl.so.1.0.0 refer to the ABI version -
>> which is different. Software version 1.0.2 is a
[moving from github to -dev]
On 01/27/2017 07:36 AM, mattcaswell wrote:
>
> 1.0.2 is the software version.
> The numbers on the end of lbssl.so.1.0.0 refer to the ABI version -
> which is different. Software version 1.0.2 is a drop in replacement
> for 1.0.1, which is a drop in replacement for
12 matches
Mail list logo