Ah, the endless confusion of cipher vs signature NID's :)
closing ticket.
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=3922
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Thanks a lot Steve for your constructive comments.
That's expected behaviour. The EVP_get_digestbynid funtion expects a digest
NID
whereas you are passing a signature NID instead. It does accept some signature
NIDs for historical compatibility reasons.
I now understand that the code I
On Mon Jun 22 20:07:43 2015, david.von.ohe...@siemens.com wrote:
Hi OpenSSL maintainers,
I tried checking the status of the EVP_get_digestbynid issue via
http://rt.openssl.org/Install/index.html
but the server appears currently misconfigured:
Config file
Hi OpenSSL maintainers,
I tried checking the status of the EVP_get_digestbynid issue via
http://rt.openssl.org/Install/index.html
but the server appears currently misconfigured:
Config file /etc/request-tracker4/RT_SiteConfig.pm is locked
Yet I found an old conversation on this topic:
