On Tue Mar 29 12:02:41 2016, noloa...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> $ cat conf_lib.patch
> >>> diff --git a/crypto/conf/conf_lib.c b/crypto/conf/conf_lib.c
> >>> index f197714..7bc3ac0 100644
> >>> --- a/crypto/conf/conf_lib.c
> >>> +++ b/crypto/conf/conf_lib.c
> >>> @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ void
> >>>
On 03/29/2016 08:58 AM, noloa...@gmail.com via RT wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Salz, Rich via RT wrote:
>> We use strdup because none of the openssl machinery (error stack, etc) might
>> be set up yet.
>>
>> The comment a few lines above says this!
> Thanks.
>
>
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Salz, Rich via RT wrote:
> We use strdup because none of the openssl machinery (error stack, etc) might
> be set up yet.
>
> The comment a few lines above says this!
Thanks.
That does not explain why this had not effect on Windows, even after
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Salz, Rich via RT wrote:
> We use strdup because none of the openssl machinery (error stack, etc) might
> be set up yet.
>
> The comment a few lines above says this!
Thanks.
That does not explain why this had not effect on Windows, even after
We use strdup because none of the openssl machinery (error stack, etc) might be
set up yet.
The comment a few lines above says this!
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4489
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To
>>> $ cat conf_lib.patch
>>> diff --git a/crypto/conf/conf_lib.c b/crypto/conf/conf_lib.c
>>> index f197714..7bc3ac0 100644
>>> --- a/crypto/conf/conf_lib.c
>>> +++ b/crypto/conf/conf_lib.c
>>> @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ void
>>> OPENSSL_INIT_set_config_filename(OPENSSL_INIT_SETTINGS *settings,
>>>
>>> $ cat conf_lib.patch
>>> diff --git a/crypto/conf/conf_lib.c b/crypto/conf/conf_lib.c
>>> index f197714..7bc3ac0 100644
>>> --- a/crypto/conf/conf_lib.c
>>> +++ b/crypto/conf/conf_lib.c
>>> @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ void
>>> OPENSSL_INIT_set_config_filename(OPENSSL_INIT_SETTINGS *settings,
>>>
On 03/28/16 15:16, Viktor Dukhovni via RT wrote:
>
>> On Mar 28, 2016, at 4:38 AM, noloa...@gmail.com via RT
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Windows, the fix below also depends upon the patch from Issue 4488
>> ("The POSIX name for this item is deprecated. Instead, use the ISO C++
>>
> On Mar 28, 2016, at 4:38 AM, noloa...@gmail.com via RT
> wrote:
>
> On Windows, the fix below also depends upon the patch from Issue 4488
> ("The POSIX name for this item is deprecated. Instead, use the ISO C++
> conformant name...").
>
> This patch below also fixes some
> On Mar 28, 2016, at 4:38 AM, noloa...@gmail.com via RT
> wrote:
>
> On Windows, the fix below also depends upon the patch from Issue 4488
> ("The POSIX name for this item is deprecated. Instead, use the ISO C++
> conformant name...").
>
> This patch below also fixes some
On Windows, the fix below also depends upon the patch from Issue 4488
("The POSIX name for this item is deprecated. Instead, use the ISO C++
conformant name...").
This patch below also fixes some problems with the older standards on
Fedora, BSD and Linux.
$ cat conf_lib.patch
diff --git
11 matches
Mail list logo