> It still seems like pqueue out to be excised from the source base and replace
> with something simpler.
Agree.
Could you go to Github and open an issue on this?
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4558
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
--
open
> It still seems like pqueue out to be excised from the source base and replace
> with something simpler.
Agree.
Could you go to Github and open an issue on this?
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
| Network Security & Encryption
Phone +61 7 3031 7217
Oracle Australia
-Original Message-
From: David Benjamin via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Tuesday, 14 June 2016 2:16 AM
To: Paul Dale
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4558] Performance issue wit
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 4:04 AM Matt Caswell via RT wrote:
> On Thu Jun 02 23:24:44 2016, paul.d...@oracle.com wrote:
> > The DTLS packet reassembly code has a performance problem that could
> > result in a DoS attack being possible.
> >
> >
> >
> > The DTLS packet reassembly uses the data struct
On Thu Jun 02 23:24:44 2016, paul.d...@oracle.com wrote:
> The DTLS packet reassembly code has a performance problem that could
> result in a DoS attack being possible.
>
>
>
> The DTLS packet reassembly uses the data structure defined in
> ssl/pqueue.c for the purpose (it is the only user of this
The DTLS packet reassembly code has a performance problem that could result in
a DoS attack being possible.
The DTLS packet reassembly uses the data structure defined in ssl/pqueue.c for
the purpose (it is the only user of this data structure that I can find). This
source file implements a