Re: [openssl-dev] About Chinese crypto-algorithms

2016-09-28 Thread Dmitry Belyavsky
Hello Robin, On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Salz, Rich wrote: > (I subscribed you to openssl-dev; I hope it works.) > > ISO standards are “pay to play.” That is, any member organization can get > something as an ISO standard with not much effort. :) > > >> "I strongly

Re: [openssl-dev] About Chinese crypto-algorithms

2016-09-27 Thread Salz, Rich
> Neither of these two looks like it would be difficult to implement. Again, I strongly recommend that if anyone works on this, they do it as an externally-provided ENGINE, like GOST. -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Re: [openssl-dev] About Chinese crypto-algorithms

2016-09-27 Thread Joey Yandle
le | Cryptographer | Network Security & Encryption > Phone +61 7 3031 7217 > Oracle Australia > > > -Original Message- > From: Salz, Rich [mailto:rs...@akamai.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 28 September 2016 2:26 AM > To: openssl-dev@openssl.org; robin <arcueid.ch...@y

Re: [openssl-dev] About Chinese crypto-algorithms

2016-09-27 Thread Paul Dale
.org; robin <arcueid.ch...@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [openssl-dev] About Chinese crypto-algorithms > Is there currently any documentation at all on these Chinese algorithms? > I'm certainly curious, and I'm sure others in the OpenSSL community will be. Also, please know that we are

Re: [openssl-dev] About Chinese crypto-algorithms

2016-09-27 Thread Salz, Rich
> Is there currently any documentation at all on these Chinese algorithms? > I'm certainly curious, and I'm sure others in the OpenSSL community will be. Also, please know that we are already looking at several large projects (TLS 1.3, FIPS, etc). In my personal opinion, I would be surprised if

Re: [openssl-dev] About Chinese crypto-algorithms

2016-09-27 Thread Steve Marquess
On 09/27/2016 11:24 AM, robin wrote: > Thanks for your reply Marquess. I understand English documents are > essential factor to start, and I certainly sure it is not A problem > to translate these kinds of published standard to English version if > there's no other unclear reasons. > > In the