Re: [openssl-dev] Can I haz TLS 1.3 ?

2017-10-04 Thread Richard Moore
On 3 October 2017 at 20:45, Hanno Böck wrote: > On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 17:36:03 + > "Salz, Rich via openssl-dev" wrote: > > So I heard chatter about this, but not much details. Which I find > unfortunate and a bit disturbing. (I'm aware of a single case

Re: [openssl-dev] Can I haz TLS 1.3 ?

2017-10-04 Thread Richard Levitte
It's not specific to devops. Here, a quick history lesson: https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/20356/origin-of-i-can-haz Cheers Richard Ted Marynicz skrev: (4 oktober 2017 10:53:35 CEST) >Haz? > >Is that some kind of devops-speak I am not (yet) aware of? > >Ted

Re: [openssl-dev] Can I haz TLS 1.3 ?

2017-10-03 Thread Salz, Rich via openssl-dev
Can the people involved in these Tests please speak up what's going on here? Particularly can you please name vendor names? Tbe TLSWG mailing list is probably a more effective place to have that discussion; I was just informing the OpenSSL community of the state of play ;) --

Re: [openssl-dev] Can I haz TLS 1.3 ?

2017-10-03 Thread Hanno Böck
Hi, On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 17:36:03 + "Salz, Rich via openssl-dev" wrote: > Tests run by various companies, including Google, Mozilla, and > Facebook, indicate that the “failure rate” of TLS 1.3 is disturbingly > high. It appears that network hardware such as routers,

[openssl-dev] Can I haz TLS 1.3 ?

2017-10-03 Thread Salz, Rich via openssl-dev
Some people have asked why TLS 1.3 isn’t available yet. This might help; it’s a draft of a posting for my company’s blog. Can I Haz TLS 1.3 ? Everybody wants to be able to use TLS 1.3. Among the reasons are: It’s faster – being able to reconnect to a server you’ve previously