On 3 October 2017 at 20:45, Hanno Böck wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 17:36:03 +
> "Salz, Rich via openssl-dev" wrote:
>
> So I heard chatter about this, but not much details. Which I find
> unfortunate and a bit disturbing. (I'm aware of a single case
It's not specific to devops. Here, a quick history lesson:
https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/20356/origin-of-i-can-haz
Cheers
Richard
Ted Marynicz skrev: (4 oktober 2017 10:53:35 CEST)
>Haz?
>
>Is that some kind of devops-speak I am not (yet) aware of?
>
>Ted
Can the people involved in these Tests please speak up what's going on
here? Particularly can you please name vendor names?
Tbe TLSWG mailing list is probably a more effective place to have that
discussion; I was just informing the OpenSSL community of the state of play ;)
--
Hi,
On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 17:36:03 +
"Salz, Rich via openssl-dev" wrote:
> Tests run by various companies, including Google, Mozilla, and
> Facebook, indicate that the “failure rate” of TLS 1.3 is disturbingly
> high. It appears that network hardware such as routers,
Some people have asked why TLS 1.3 isn’t available yet. This might help; it’s
a draft of a posting for my company’s blog.
Can I Haz TLS 1.3 ?
Everybody wants to be able to use TLS 1.3. Among the reasons are:
It’s faster – being able to reconnect to a server you’ve
previously