> It looks like ordinals are changing and/or being removed for functions
> exported by the Windows DLL. Its causing pain points for users in the
> field, and it appears to be trending. Confer:
>
> * WAMP OpenSSL ordinal 372 error, http://stackoverflow.com/q/36238887
> * The Ordinal 112 could not
In message
on Sun, 27 Mar 2016 06:09:39 -0400, Jeffrey Walton said:
noloader> It looks like ordinals are changing and/or being removed for functions
noloader> exported by the Windows DLL. Its causing pain points for users in the
noloader> field, and it appears to be trending. Confer:
noloader>
It looks like ordinals are changing and/or being removed for functions
exported by the Windows DLL. Its causing pain points for users in the
field, and it appears to be trending. Confer:
* WAMP OpenSSL ordinal 372 error, http://stackoverflow.com/q/36238887
* The Ordinal 112 could not be located