No, thanks, that looks good!
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Hi Rich,
>> Just go ahead a file a pull request anyway...that's the best way of getting
>> comments. If changes are needed you can update the PR as required.
>
> Like, for example, documenting this new function. :)
Sure, I did mention it alongside its get0 counterpart in
> Just go ahead a file a pull request anyway...that's the best way of getting
> comments. If changes are needed you can update the PR as required.
Like, for example, documenting this new function. :)
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe:
Hi Matt,
thanks for your quick reply.
>> Please also see my commit
>> https://github.com/satta/openssl/commit/4392b12a0caa8f8e7df0bb6e1c94de7f744407ba
>> implementing this. Looking forward to some comments -- if you are OK
>> with it I would be happy to file a pull request. My CLA has been
On 08/11/16 12:41, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> Dear OpenSSL developer team,
>
> following up on the discussion quoted below on the openssl-users ML I
> would like to ask your opinions on adding a OCSP_resp_get1_id() function:
>
> int OCSP_resp_get1_id(const OCSP_BASICRESP *bs,
>
Dear OpenSSL developer team,
following up on the discussion quoted below on the openssl-users ML I
would like to ask your opinions on adding a OCSP_resp_get1_id() function:
int OCSP_resp_get1_id(const OCSP_BASICRESP *bs,
ASN1_OCTET_STRING **pid,
