Re: [openssl-dev] Mailman version used by OpenSSL is misconfigured and/or broken in relation to DKIM

2015-08-18 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:55:53AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: However, there are two solutions to that allow adding a footer when list subscribers may have DKIM signed email: a) As noted in the OpenDKIM README, in the Mailing Lists section, if the list traffic is itself has DKIM

Re: [openssl-dev] Mailman version used by OpenSSL is misconfigured and/or broken in relation to DKIM

2015-08-18 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 11:30 AM +0200 Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be wrote: On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:55:53AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: However, there are two solutions to that allow adding a footer when list subscribers may have DKIM signed email: a) As noted in the OpenDKIM

Re: [openssl-dev] Mailman version used by OpenSSL is misconfigured and/or broken in relation to DKIM

2015-08-17 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Wednesday, August 05, 2015 5:54 PM +0200 Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be wrote: On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 06:54:33AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: Yesterday, I was alerted by a member of the list that my emails to openssl-dev are ending up in their SPAM folder. After examining my emails as

[openssl-dev] Mailman version used by OpenSSL is misconfigured and/or broken in relation to DKIM

2015-08-05 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
Yesterday, I was alerted by a member of the list that my emails to openssl-dev are ending up in their SPAM folder. After examining my emails as sent out by OpenSSL's mailman, I saw that it is mucking with the headers, causing DKIM failures. This could be because of one of two reasons: a)

Re: [openssl-dev] Mailman version used by OpenSSL is misconfigured and/or broken in relation to DKIM

2015-08-05 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 06:54:33AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: Yesterday, I was alerted by a member of the list that my emails to openssl-dev are ending up in their SPAM folder. After examining my emails as sent out by OpenSSL's mailman, I saw that it is mucking with the headers,

Re: [openssl-dev] Mailman version used by OpenSSL is misconfigured and/or broken in relation to DKIM

2015-08-05 Thread mancha
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 04:54:25PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 06:54:33AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: Yesterday, I was alerted by a member of the list that my emails to openssl-dev are ending up in their SPAM folder. After examining my emails as sent out by

Re: [openssl-dev] Mailman version used by OpenSSL is misconfigured and/or broken in relation to DKIM

2015-08-05 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 04:54:57PM +, mancha wrote: I interpret the comment to mean that, because OpenSSL lists modify messages (see below), they should strip DKIM headers (see above) before distribution to prevent false negatives in recipient implementations. Won't that always give DKIM

Re: [openssl-dev] Mailman version used by OpenSSL is misconfigured and/or broken in relation to DKIM

2015-08-05 Thread mancha
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 09:33:02PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 04:54:57PM +, mancha wrote: I interpret the comment to mean that, because OpenSSL lists modify messages (see below), they should strip DKIM headers (see above) before distribution to prevent false

Re: [openssl-dev] Mailman version used by OpenSSL is misconfigured and/or broken in relation to DKIM

2015-08-05 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 05/08/15 23:00, mancha wrote: OpenSSL is certainly not alone in its practice of mangling headers and adding body footers so I'd be curious to hear how other lists handle domains such as yahoo.com. We warn people that DKIM-using domains may experience bounces, and that they should subscribe

Re: [openssl-dev] Mailman version used by OpenSSL is misconfigured and/or broken in relation to DKIM

2015-08-05 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Wed 2015-08-05 17:04:30 -0400, Jonas Maebe wrote: On 05/08/15 23:00, mancha wrote: OpenSSL is certainly not alone in its practice of mangling headers and adding body footers so I'd be curious to hear how other lists handle domains such as yahoo.com. We warn people that DKIM-using domains