Re: [openssl-dev] Please consider delaying the Beta-1 freeze for a week or two

2016-03-11 Thread Emilia Käsper
Returning to the issue at hand: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/851 On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 7:24 PM Erik Forsberg wrote: > add Solaris to the platforms that are not at beta-level yet. > Richard Levitte and myself are helping each other out though, so we should > be close

Re: [openssl-dev] Please consider delaying the Beta-1 freeze for a week or two

2016-03-11 Thread Erik Forsberg
add Solaris to the platforms that are not at beta-level yet. Richard Levitte and myself are helping each other out though, so we should be close >-- Original Message -- > >> noloader> Testing master on real hardware is showing some minor issues on a >> few >> noloader> platforms, including

Re: [openssl-dev] Please consider delaying the Beta-1 freeze for a week or two

2016-03-11 Thread Salz, Rich
> but from my point of view it is really hard to contribute code to OpenSSL. Things are much better, but it is still harder than we'd like. Hopefully it will continue to improve. > I feel really sorry for the authors of PR's that got first review but their > code won't get into 1.1 because of

Re: [openssl-dev] Please consider delaying the Beta-1 freeze for a week or two

2016-03-11 Thread Jaroslav Imrich
On 11 March 2016 at 15:22, Salz, Rich wrote: > > I would like to point out that there are several already reviewed pull > requests with new features - e.g. [0] and [1] - waiting to be merged. Do > openssl devs plan to address these before 1.1 freeze? > > >[0]

Re: [openssl-dev] Please consider delaying the Beta-1 freeze for a week or two

2016-03-11 Thread Salz, Rich
> I would like to point out that there are several already reviewed pull > requests with new features - e.g. [0] and [1] - waiting to be merged. Do > openssl devs plan to address these before 1.1 freeze? >[0] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/576 > [1]

Re: [openssl-dev] Please consider delaying the Beta-1 freeze for a week or two

2016-03-11 Thread Jaroslav Imrich
On 11 March 2016 at 10:21, Matt Caswell wrote: > I'd argue that a freeze helps us to iron the issues out. Problems tend > to get introduced when new features are added. By declaring a freeze we > no longer accept new features and can instead divert our attention to > stability

Re: [openssl-dev] Please consider delaying the Beta-1 freeze for a week or two

2016-03-11 Thread Ben Laurie
On 11 March 2016 at 09:24, Jeffrey Walton wrote: >> noloader> Testing master on real hardware is showing some minor issues on a >> few >> noloader> platforms, including ARM32, ARM64, PowerPC and i686. In addition, >> noloader> there seems to be one-off issues on other

Re: [openssl-dev] Please consider delaying the Beta-1 freeze for a week or two

2016-03-11 Thread Jeffrey Walton
> noloader> Testing master on real hardware is showing some minor issues on a > few > noloader> platforms, including ARM32, ARM64, PowerPC and i686. In addition, > noloader> there seems to be one-off issues on other combinations, like VIA's > C7 > noloader> processor on Linux. > noloader> >

Re: [openssl-dev] Please consider delaying the Beta-1 freeze for a week or two

2016-03-11 Thread Matt Caswell
On 11/03/16 01:03, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Testing master on real hardware is showing some minor issues on a few > platforms, including ARM32, ARM64, PowerPC and i686. In addition, > there seems to be one-off issues on other combinations, like VIA's C7 > processor on Linux. >

Re: [openssl-dev] Please consider delaying the Beta-1 freeze for a week or two

2016-03-10 Thread Richard Levitte
In message

[openssl-dev] Please consider delaying the Beta-1 freeze for a week or two

2016-03-10 Thread Jeffrey Walton
Hi Everyone, Testing master on real hardware is showing some minor issues on a few platforms, including ARM32, ARM64, PowerPC and i686. In addition, there seems to be one-off issues on other combinations, like VIA's C7 processor on Linux. In addition to the base issues, there are other minor