Re: [openssl.org #1997] [PATCH] DTLS timeout handling bug

2009-08-13 Thread Robin Seggelmann via RT
On Aug 12, 2009, at 3:23 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote: >> [seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Wed Aug 12 08:34:27 2009]: >> >> >> Ok, here's an updated version. Internally is dtls1_get_timeout() and >> dtls1_handle_timeout() used. They can be called externally using >> SSL_ctrl() with DTLS_CTRL_GET_TI

[openssl.org #1997] [PATCH] DTLS timeout handling bug

2009-08-12 Thread Stephen Henson via RT
> [seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Wed Aug 12 08:34:27 2009]: > > > Ok, here's an updated version. Internally is dtls1_get_timeout() and > dtls1_handle_timeout() used. They can be called externally using > SSL_ctrl() with DTLS_CTRL_GET_TIMEOUT and DTLS_CTRL_HANDLE_TIMEOUT or > with the correspo

Re: [openssl.org #1997] [PATCH] DTLS timeout handling bug

2009-08-12 Thread Robin Seggelmann via RT
On Aug 11, 2009, at 7:40 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote: >> [seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Mon Jul 27 17:03:25 2009]: >> >> This patch fixes the timeout handling. The method dtls1_get_timeout() >> was intended to determine the next handshake message timeout when >> using select() calls, to set thei

Re: [openssl.org #1997] [PATCH] DTLS timeout handling bug

2009-08-11 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009, Michael Txen wrote: > > On Aug 11, 2009, at 9:15 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: > >> >> Using SSL_ctrl() in a similar way to (for example) >> SSL_set_tlsext_host_name(). > Do you mean using SSL_ctrl() instead of DTLSv1_get_timeout()? How should > DTLSv1_handle_timeout() be ha

Re: [openssl.org #1997] [PATCH] DTLS timeout handling bug

2009-08-11 Thread Michael Tüxen
On Aug 11, 2009, at 9:15 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: On Tue, Aug 11, 2009, Michael Txen wrote: On Aug 11, 2009, at 7:40 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote: [seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Mon Jul 27 17:03:25 2009]: This patch fixes the timeout handling. The method dtls1_get_timeout() was in

Re: [openssl.org #1997] [PATCH] DTLS timeout handling bug

2009-08-11 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009, Michael Txen wrote: > On Aug 11, 2009, at 7:40 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote: > >>> [seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Mon Jul 27 17:03:25 2009]: >>> >>> This patch fixes the timeout handling. The method dtls1_get_timeout() >>> was intended to determine the next handshake message

Re: [openssl.org #1997] [PATCH] DTLS timeout handling bug

2009-08-11 Thread Michael Tüxen
On Aug 11, 2009, at 7:40 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote: [seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Mon Jul 27 17:03:25 2009]: This patch fixes the timeout handling. The method dtls1_get_timeout() was intended to determine the next handshake message timeout when using select() calls, to set their timeout. T

[openssl.org #1997] [PATCH] DTLS timeout handling bug

2009-08-11 Thread Stephen Henson via RT
> [seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Mon Jul 27 17:03:25 2009]: > > This patch fixes the timeout handling. The method dtls1_get_timeout() > was intended to determine the next handshake message timeout when > using select() calls, to set their timeout. This method is renamed to > DTLSv1_get_timeout

[openssl.org #1997] [PATCH] DTLS timeout handling bug

2009-07-27 Thread Robin Seggelmann via RT
This patch fixes the timeout handling. The method dtls1_get_timeout() was intended to determine the next handshake message timeout when using select() calls, to set their timeout. This method is renamed to DTLSv1_get_timeout(), to fit the common naming scheme and the declaration is moved. I