On Fri, Apr 12, 2013, Balakumaran Kannan wrote:
Thanks Steve for showing interest on this.
And I think we could start another thread discussing this patch and
improving it.
One of the biggest concerns is portability. OpenSSL runs on all manner of
weird systems and apparently harmless
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013, Michael Tuexen wrote:
The main point is whether the OpenSSL maintainers are interested in IPv6
support or not.
If they are, the patch can be optimized in whatever way they want. I they are
not, the
patch goes nowhere, so optimizing it doesn't make much sense...
Best
--On Thursday, April 11, 2013 9:37 AM -0700 Dan Mahoney, System Admin
d...@prime.gushi.org wrote:
I would love it if the maintainers would actually come forward and give
a direct answer on whether or not they're interested.
+1
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Thursday, April 11, 2013 9:37 AM -0700 Dan Mahoney, System
Admin d...@prime.gushi.org wrote:
I would love it if the maintainers would actually come forward and give
a direct answer on whether or not they're interested.
+1
Well I'm
] [PATCH] IPv6 support for s_client and s_server
Well I'm interested, though I'm a bit overwhelmed with other things ATM to look
at the patch in any detail. Note that due to the versioning scheme the earliest
this could appear in a release in 1.0.2.
Steve
Thanks Steve for showing interest on this.
And I think we could start another thread discussing this patch and
improving it.
Regards,
Bala
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Mike Frysinger via RT r...@openssl.orgwrote:
i've improved the original patch to make the -4/-6 behavior consistent
across
the tools. i also tweaked the behavior slightly to make it run correctly
(imo).
-mike
I tried your patch it works well. Thank you
Anyway, I need IPv6 support. I'm going to refine this patch and use. If the
community people are interested I'll share it.
Regards,
Bala.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Michael Tuexen tue...@fh-muenster.dewrote:
On Apr 10, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Balakumaran Kannan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013
On Apr 10, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Balakumaran Kannan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Mike Frysinger via RT r...@openssl.org
wrote:
i've improved the original patch to make the -4/-6 behavior consistent across
the tools. i also tweaked the behavior slightly to make it run correctly
i've improved the original patch to make the -4/-6 behavior consistent across
the tools. i also tweaked the behavior slightly to make it run correctly
(imo).
-mike
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2051
user/pass: guest/guest
Index: apps/s_apps.h
Here is an updated version of the patch for the current 1.0.1 branch.
Best regards
Robin
ipv6.patch
Description: Binary data
11 matches
Mail list logo