Fixed in HEAD. Now le'ts see those cross-certify enhancements :)
commit c9a81b3026dcd2e78ce3ee85bfd93e3d0f1eac71
Author: Rich Salz rs...@akamai.com
Date: Fri Aug 15 17:20:26 2014 -0400
RT2751: Declare get_issuer_sk() earlier.
Add a declaration for get_issuer_sk() so that other
functions in
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Henson via RT r...@openssl.org
To: var...@yahoo.com
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Sent: Saturday, March 3, 2012 8:31 AM
Subject: [openssl.org #2751] [ENHANCEMENT] Request moving static
get_issuer_sk before X509_verify_cert
[var...@yahoo.com
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Henson via RT r...@openssl.org
To: var...@yahoo.com
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Sent: Saturday, March 3, 2012 8:31 AM
Subject: [openssl.org #2751] [ENHANCEMENT] Request moving static
get_issuer_sk before X509_verify_cert
[var...@yahoo.com
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012, Kevin Vargo via RT wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Henson via RT r...@openssl.org
To: var...@yahoo.com
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Sent: Saturday, March 3, 2012 8:31 AM
Subject: [openssl.org #2751] [ENHANCEMENT] Request moving static
I'd like to request moving the static function get_issuer_sk higher in the
x509_vf.c file, to permit it's use by other functions in the file, such as:
int X509_verify_cert(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx)
Attached is the patch that simply moves the function's declaration higher up in
the file.
I'll
[var...@yahoo.com - Sat Mar 03 13:23:18 2012]:
I'll submit another request related to why I want this done; but the
move itself should be OK, I think. [I would like to be able to
check the trusted store for any matching issuer when building the
client-verification chain. This
