[openssl.org #305] A bug in util/mkcerts.sh (release 0.9.6d)?

2002-11-15 Thread Lutz Jaenicke via RT
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Oct 16 23:05:31 2002]: Hey, I didn't actually RUN the thing, I just noticed that file and like tools didn't report it as a shell script, which got me thinking... :-D Thanks for a prompt reply, in any case. Thanks, fixed. Best regards, Lutz

[openssl.org #305] A bug in util/mkcerts.sh (release 0.9.6d)?

2002-10-16 Thread Igor Pechtchanski via RT
Hi, A quick search of the openssl-users and openssl-dev mailing lists turned up nothing, so I'll take a chance that this isn't a known bug and send it in... I'm probably nitpicking, but line 1 of util/mkcerts.sh is missing a '/' in the magic header: (currently #!bin/sh). If the script is meant

Re: [openssl.org #305] A bug in util/mkcerts.sh (release 0.9.6d)?

2002-10-16 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 16 Oct 2002 20:49:37 +0200 (METDST), Igor Pechtchanski via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rt I'm probably nitpicking, but line 1 of util/mkcerts.sh is missing a '/' in rt the magic header: (currently #!bin/sh). If the script is meant to be rt run directly, the

Re: [openssl.org #305] A bug in util/mkcerts.sh (release 0.9.6d)?

2002-10-16 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 16 Oct 2002 20:49:37 +0200 (METDST), Igor Pechtchanski via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rt I'm probably nitpicking, but line 1 of util/mkcerts.sh is missing a '/' in rt the magic header: (currently #!bin/sh). If the script is meant to be rt run directly, the

Re: [openssl.org #305] A bug in util/mkcerts.sh (release 0.9.6d)?

2002-10-16 Thread Igor Pechtchanski via RT
Hey, I didn't actually RUN the thing, I just noticed that file and like tools didn't report it as a shell script, which got me thinking... :-D Thanks for a prompt reply, in any case. Igor On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on

Re: [openssl.org #305] A bug in util/mkcerts.sh (release 0.9.6d)?

2002-10-16 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
Hey, I didn't actually RUN the thing, I just noticed that file and like tools didn't report it as a shell script, which got me thinking... :-D Thanks for a prompt reply, in any case. Igor On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on