The assembly code seems to have been included already.
The platforms we want are included already.
I think we've got the 'good bits' from this; if not, please
open a new ticket to cover it. thanks.
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
:[openssl.org #782] IBM patches to OpenSSL-0.9.7c
The assembly code seems to have been included already.
The platforms we want are included already.
I think we've got the 'good bits' from this; if not, please
open a new ticket to cover it. thanks.
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs
via RT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 5:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [openssl.org #782] IBM patches to OpenSSL-0.9.7c
[levitte - Mon Dec 1 13:18:42 2003]:
Uh, are you sure you attached ibm.patch? I can't seem to see that
patch
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Gaurav Khanna wrote:
I was curious about the diffs/patch and config mentioned in the posting
below (The itanium part if segregated, or the complete patch) and was
rummaging the list for that.
Is there someplace i can download from, or look at the patch.
You need to get
Uh, are you sure you attached ibm.patch? I can't seem to see that
patch.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Dec 1 08:34:29 2003]:
[...]
Diff's between OpenSSL-0.9.7c and IBM's code.
(See attached file: ibm.patch)
IBM specific configuration. i.e. the options we pass through to
OpenSSL
[levitte - Mon Dec 1 13:18:42 2003]:
Uh, are you sure you attached ibm.patch? I can't seem to see that
patch.
Yes, the patch was attached to the Mail (some 2.x MB)... I will attach a
compressed version to this reply.
Best regards,
Lutz
